Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Unless my internet connection gets much faster i personally don't see much use for this. Even with Fios my 802.11g network is more then fast enough. Of course i am not streaming HD video around my home.
That 7Gbps over a 30 foot range is some sort of smokin' hot speed. Be interesting to see if it really pans out.
I'd be happy if I could just get the 300Mbps that was advertised for 802.11n. Even right next to the access point, can't get connected at over 130Mbps and actual file transfers seem even slower (like 50Mbps).
I'd be happy if I could just get the 300Mbps that was advertised for 802.11n. Even right next to the access point, can't get connected at over 130Mbps and actual file transfers seem even slower (like 50Mbps).
Same issue here. I have one of the top rated 802.11n routers, and I'm convinced 300Mbps is just a fantasy number they came up with to sell more routers. Grats on winning the contest the other day Ken.
Either way, you have to admit that the WiGig is a sweet gIg!
Now this is going to really good if it can replace bluetooth. With those speed you won't have to a lot just to transfer a song or something bigger, like a movie.
This sounds like it would be good to connect all your multimedia gear and home network, no more cables.
I have a Buffalo N300 and I get the full 300 (drops to 270 sometimes) with a wall in between.
I have a Buffalo N300 and I get the full 300 (drops to 270 sometimes) with a wall in between.
i suppose u r referring to the connection speed on the router page..but at the user end connection speed definitely never exceed 130mbps and like ken777 said,real world throughput is around 50-60mbps
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.