also @ TechSpot: Google warns users infected with DNSChanger malware, provides help

Tech Tip of the Week: How Small is 32 Nanometers?

in-house feature

By

On February 24, 2010, 4:58 AM EST

Earlier this year Intel made a big splash with a new generation of Core i3 and Core i5 processors using the uber small 32 nanometer manufacturing process. Although this is eventually going to get dumped as ancient technology for an even smaller and more efficient way to produce chips, today it's state of the art.

Intel recently published a whitepaper with some amusing 32nm facts that we are reproducing here for you. If you have ever wondered how small the logic inside these chips really is in 'measurable' terms, here are some random facts to give you some perspective:

  • A nanometer is so small that it takes a billion of them to make a meter. A billion is a huge number. A stack of a billion sheets of paper would be 100 km high. If you could walk a billion steps, you would go around the earth 20 times.
  • A 32nm transistor can switch on and off over 300 billion times in one second. It would take you 4000 years to flick a light switch on and off that many times.

Continue reading our Tech Tip of the Week.

No tags on this story

User Comments (19)

Post a comment
Decimae
on February 24, 2010
9:20 AM

They forgot too add the size of an atom! The size of an atom is averagely 0.25 nm, and wires consisting of atom are really hard to produce and the normal laws of resistance don't apply with those. If Moore's law is every two years the size of the transistor halves, and we assume we won't be able to make stable wires which are thinner than 4 atoms(which is likely) it won't apply in 2022.

Reply

TomSEA
on February 24, 2010
10:21 AM

I love seeing stuff like this - taking measurements of one sort of the other and putting it into a perspective anyone can understand. Amazing....

Reply

Docnoq
on February 24, 2010
11:47 AM

Damn slacking space industry.. if only they had kept up with their innovation like the rest of the technology sector!

Reply

skitzo_zac
on February 24, 2010
7:16 PM

Very novelty and a nice change of pace compared to all the other tech news.

Reply

9Nails
on February 24, 2010
7:52 PM

Seriously? 4 Million transistors would fit into the period at the end of a sentence? I can hardly imagine 10 of anything fitting into a space that small. Let alone several Million! Wow.

Reply

AtK SpAdE
on February 24, 2010
10:40 PM

Very cool article!

Reply

Wendig0
on February 25, 2010
12:19 AM

Nicely done Julio. I always enjoy stuff like this!

Reply

CMH
on February 25, 2010
8:11 AM

Lol, Julio did copy all the facts off elsewhere (which was referenced in the article).

Should thank Intel instead

Anyways, I'm gonna go see how long it'll take me to flick that light switch....

Reply

kozman
on March 5, 2010
9:15 PM

I wonder how these are manufactured? NanoBots?

Reply

megrawab
on March 6, 2010
5:03 AM

We're getting modern and modern.. and technology gets more harder and harder. lol... 32 nanometers, 32*10^-9? Nice! I have to be a geek or a nerdy to be able to make core i3, what more if it's core i5...

Reply

JamesP
on March 9, 2010
1:29 AM

I wonder how these are manufactured? NanoBots?

By nanochinese

Reply

jobeard
on March 9, 2010
6:57 PM

I wonder how these are manufactured? NanoBots?

nao-nao ... "Mork & Mindy"

Reply

zyodei
on March 13, 2010
7:02 AM

The 4 million in the period on a screen bit really blew my mind...

Reply

Thompson
on March 14, 2010
3:05 AM

My mind = BLOWN

Reply

JMMD
on March 15, 2010
6:13 AM

It's pretty amazing how far this technology has come. Just trying to imagine some of these numbers give me a headache, I can't even begin to think about the technology 10 or 20 years from now.

Reply

chuchu232
on March 16, 2010
12:38 AM

My god, thats small! I doubt the whole period thing though considering im using an iphone at the moment. now if i zoom in... thats better

Reply

CMH
on March 17, 2010
8:33 AM

Still flicking light switches....

Reply

buttus
on March 17, 2010
11:02 AM

that's VERY small. Wow. I wonder where the theoretical limit is though for reducing die size?

Reply

sagejay
on March 18, 2010
9:04 PM

yes it's indeed quite small, I'm pretty sure, soon enough there's going to be super small camera and everything, technology is starting to scare me

Reply

Browse more commented news

Post a new comment

Guest user

To post as an anonymous
user click here
.

Members

If you are a TechSpot member,
please login first.


By signing up you gain complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of computer and technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Post messages, get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.