Home › News › The Web
Google wins landmark copyright case against Viacom
The legal battle raged on and just a few months ago, in March 2010, it was discovered that Viacom managers had been uploading video to YouTube and covering their tracks after the suit was already filed. Google always maintained its position that YouTube complies with the requirements in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by removing infringing material upon owners' requests, and today, after a lot of back and forth the court has sided with them.
Judge Stanton agreed with Google's argument, noting that when YouTube received a takedown notice for an infringing item, "they swiftly removed it." The ruling commends Google's efforts to automatically filter out infringing videos, but said video sites are not required to, adding that simply acting promptly when studios alert them of pirated clips is enough. This essentially puts the burden on entertainment companies, who will be tasked with hunting down pirated content themselves. Viacom wasn't pleased with the ruling, calling it fundamentally flawed, and has announced plans to appeal.
Even though the fight is certainly not over yet, this is seen as a major win for YouTube. For one thing, more content providers may warm up to the idea of streaming videos on YouTube now that the site has been cleared of its copyright infringement stigma. It's also an eye opener for content owners that they need to adapt to today's reality of widespread digital sharing, finding ways to exploit and benefit from this.
User Comments (3)
Post a comment|
princeton
on June 24, 2010 12:58 PM |
"Viacom managers had been uploading video to YouTube and covering their tracks after the suit was already filed." Will Viacom have any consequences for that? In my opinion they should. |
|
Vrmithrax
on June 24, 2010 2:23 PM |
My thoughts too, princeton. At the very least some kind of tampering or obstruction of justice charges. Seriously, that's just dirty pool, and for obviously malicious acts to be swept under the rug would be unconscionable. If I was Google, I'd throw a countersuit at them... Make em squirm. |
|
matrix86
on June 24, 2010 7:33 PM |
Viacom wasn't pleased with the ruling, calling it fundamentally flawed, and has announced plans to appeal. Really, Viacom? YouTube did absolutely nothing wrong, and you have ZERO proof that Google bought YouTube for the sheer purpose of distributing pirated videos. And why are you complaining? At least (like the two above me mentioned) they didn't get onto your @sses for uploading video to YouTube and covering their tracks after the suit was already filed Had I been the judge, after I ruled in favor of Google, I would have turned to you and opened up a whole can of "Whoop @ss" on you based on the above statement. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Keyboard Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.