Sign up for a new account or log in here:
also @ TechSpot: Building a Thin Mini-ITX PC: Small and Silent Performance
Today a source familiar with AMD product planning has come forward to deny such rumors by calling the 18W and 25W TDPs for Ontario "not reasonable and well outside the margin of error". Although the source did not disclose any actual power consumption details regarding the first Fusion chips, X-bit labs claims to have seen documents describing their higher-end siblings (Llano) as Phenom II-class x86 chips with high-end graphics cores that are meant to fit into a 20W thermal envelope. Thus, having them overlap in terms of performance or power consumption wouldn't make sense.
Ontario-based products are expected to feature one or two Bobcat x86 cores merged with a graphics core capable of DirectX 11 rendering. Although AMD hasn't shared much beyond that, it is has previously been implied that Bobcat itself is sub-1W-capable and will be a direct competitor for Intel's Atom.
User Comments: 4
Got something to say? Post a comment-
Sounds better and better!
-
It does but will it come too late? Time benchmarks and Intel's firepower will tell. The atom seems to be moving along at a slow rate but a rate non the less.
-
I agree with Kibaruk. It was encouraging to hear they were ahead of schedule, but those initial TDP numbers that were reported put it well into the upper end netbook realm at the best. If they can keep the power sipping way down, this could definitely be a true competitor to the Atom.
-
I have recently purchased a dual core Atom 330 + nVidia ION motherboard running with a 500 gb Seagate 2.5" drive. This has total max consumption of 30 watts at the wall socket.
I believe AMD still has ways to go!
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
Featured on Routers
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.