Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Oh wow. I missed the word glasses in the title and I thought it was some sort of joke. Anyway I'm not going to invest in a screen I can't watch for more than 30min without having eye strain and a headache.
on the plus side if this new technology gets people watching less and out and more active, I'm all for it ![]()
hello ...
3D is bound to happen & i said it would take a few years to get it mainstream, now it has begun ![]()
cheers!
I'll believe it when I see it (pun intended).
Yeah, but you won't have that problem with the glasses free tv. I've demoed a few tv's at best buy and the glasses were indeed a turn off (some od them VERY uncomfortible.
All 3-D does for regular programing is it adds more depth. It's not like the 3-D in the movies where it's all in your face. Regular tv programming just has more depth to it. It's REALLY nice and cool looking, and I wouldn't mind buying one when the price comes down.
But as for the tv's that require glasses, no thanks. They're expensive, ugly, uncomfortable, and the shutter glasses require you to watch tv in a darkened room (I was using them in the store and the area around the tv which was white was flashing from the shuttering of the glasses...very annoying and irritating to the eye).
First off it isn't 3D until you don't need glasses, its just an illusion.
This promise has been made a lot over the past year with next to no result, so its time to step up with some results if they want consumers to actually get excited.
Agree with the post above and Toms. I will believe it when I see it. Which some how, I feel this may just fall short.
hello ...
Do I need to run & pre-order some 3D blu-rays off HD Movie source !?
cheers!
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.