Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Considering TechSpot's audience mix of techies, hardware enthusiasts, IT pros and gamers, the question above sounds overly simplistic, if not insulting, but is it? Over the last decade, the MHz measurement in your PC's processor has lost much of its meaning, in part because it's no longer an absolute reflection of performance, but that may not the end of it.
For example, I know I'm running a Core i7 870 processor in my workstation, but I have no clue what exact frequency the CPU is running at. I don't think that would have been the case 5 or 10 years ago when I ran my overclocked Celeron 300a or Athlon dual-core processor. Back then I cared about clock and bus speeds, RAM timings, and other details that today I barely pay attention to before upgrading to a new platform.
With devices like smartphones and tablets invading the consumer space in sheer numbers, bringing potential irrelevancy to component specifications, do you think this is a trend that will inevitably hit computers sooner or later?
How about yourself, off the top of your head (DON'T LOOK IT UP), do you know what's your PC's CPU clock speed? Discuss.
phenom II x4 OC @ 3.6ghz, phenom II x2 @ 3.3ghz
phenom II x4 @ 3.8 ghz
i7 @ 4.2 ghz
ATM a Celeron 900 (Mobile) 2.2 Ghz. SIW says "2195 Mhz".
Phenom II X4 965BE 3.4GHz.
The way I see it, the gamers are the backbone of the computer hardware market as they're the ones constantly buying new processors, video cards, cases, CPU coolers and all that performance candy. I believe that as long as the PC gaming industry is alive and well, so will the computer hardware industry be here to stay.
Intel Core i3 3.06 GHZ
Intel 486SX 25 mhz.
I just saw the box on my closet yesterday :-)
It even has 8 megs of ram, upgrated from 4, and a massive hard drive with 110 megs (220 with hard drive compresion)
intel core i5-750 @ 3.80GHz
1090T X6 at 3.95GHz running like a dream?
x6 1100T @ 4281Mhz
i5-2400k with MSI top quality mainboard + clock
4.5ghz
The way I see it, the gamers are the backbone of the computer hardware market as they're the ones constantly buying new processors, video cards, cases, CPU coolers and all that performance candy. I believe that as long as the PC gaming industry is alive and well, so will the computer hardware industry be here to stay.
I really don't think you're all that significant in keeping the computer industry alive.
i5 760 @ 4.0 GHZ ![]()
I would feel a lot more comfortable if you overclocked that to 2.2 flat.
K, Thanks, bye?
I don't get this article.
If I type "Core i7 870" into google the first result
indicates that it is a quad core with each core @ 2.93Ghz
What's the problem ?
Obviosly ones takes the processor architecture and date of release
into consideration as well, this isn't so diffuct to do is it?
Fast architecture + high clock speed = Best performance
Slow architercture + high clock speed = Slower performance
K, Thanks, bye?
Besides, I type so slowly, there's no point to it.
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz dual core.
Core 2 Duo e8400 underclocked @ 1.3 mhz
i7-2600, 3.8 mhz.
Lots of comments in less than an hour, however you're missing the point... you are not saying anything about recalling the spec yourself or looking it up (DON'T!) ![]()
intel dual core 2.55 mhz -800 fsb
Is the $200 question, Do you know your Ram divider? ![]()
In all honesty, I have no clue. I'm running a Core i5-750 (and have been since late 09), but I have no idea what its base or Turbo Boost frequencies are offhand.
Core i7 2600 @ 3.4Ghz
AMD Phenom II X4 970BE @ 3.8ghz
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.