also @ TechSpot: Microsoft details Windows 8 and SkyDrive integration, Metro-style app

Scientists successfully cloak three-dimensional object in free space

By

January 26, 2012, 12:30 PM EST

Scientists at the University of Texas in Austin have successfully “cloaked” a three-dimensional object in free space for the first time. Unfortunately they were only able to do so for waves in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning we can’t actually “view” the invisibility with the naked eye.

Previous attempts at cloaking have been limited to two-dimensional objects or simply theoretical in nature. In the latest experiment, researchers were able to hide a three-dimensional cylindrical tube roughly 7.1-inches in length and 1-inch in diameter from microwaves in any direction in a natural environment.

To accomplish this marvel of science, the tube was covered by a shell coated with a plasmonic metamaterial that scatters light and electromagnetic waves. The shell is able to precisely cancel the light scattered by an object. By effectively cancelling out any light that would normally scatter off an object, it appears transparent.

There are a few drawbacks, however. At present, the cloak can only hide dielectric objects, not metal. Furthermore as stated earlier, the effect only works for polarized microwave light and thus isn’t visible to the naked eye. As Martin Wegener suggests, one would have to put on polarizing goggles to appreciate the cloaking.

Andrea Alu, the University of Texas professor who worked on the project and co-author of a paper published in the Institute of Physics and German Physical Society's New Journal of Physics, believes that there are some real-world applications where such a cloak could be useful. Biomedical and optical near-field measurements could be greatly improved and in the future, aircraft could be coated with the material to appear invisible to all forms of radar in any direction.

Related Stories

, , , ,

User Comments (14)

Post a comment
Twixtea
on January 26, 2012
12:54 PM
Sounds good

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 26, 2012
12:55 PM
cloaking that really isn't cloaking?

Reply | Quote

lipe123
on January 26, 2012
2:39 PM
It's invisible cloaking! XD

Reply | Quote

lchu12
on January 26, 2012
3:22 PM
Awesome.

Reply | Quote

fimbles
on January 26, 2012
4:15 PM
Quote "one would have to put on polarizing goggles to appreciate the cloaking"

Why not just wear a blindfold and everything becomes invisible?

Reply | Quote

Darth Shiv
on January 26, 2012
4:46 PM
Guest said:
cloaking that really isn't cloaking?
Being invisible to radar isn't exactly useless

Reply | Quote

Mindwraith
on January 26, 2012
7:45 PM
awesome, now I can appear invisible to my perverted microwave that follows me everywhere.

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 27, 2012
12:30 PM
We are one step closer to invisible police

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 27, 2012
5:33 PM
Who said that?

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 28, 2012
1:33 AM
I would add an LED to let us know when it is cloaked... or rather when it is not cloaked... but it would be a cloaked LED so you wouldn't be able to... never mind..

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 28, 2012
6:03 AM
So it looks like cloaking at this point is really just
a farce made up by some reporter trying to make
a name for themselves. What you have descibed is
an overblown expensive parlor trick. Not impressed
at all! Get back to us when you've got something, not
theoretical mumbo jumbo.

Reply | Quote

tengeta
on January 28, 2012
8:41 AM
ok soldiers! as long as we trick them into wearing the special glasses you will remain invisible!

just like a 3d tv, a complete lie.

Reply | Quote

Guest
on January 31, 2012
1:22 PM
"Who said that? "

I did. Tell me, if it were possible for police to be invisible, why wouldn't they?

Reply | Quote

techm633
on February 1, 2012
4:40 PM
Guest said:
Who said that?
Now thats funny! LOL!

Reply | Quote

Browse more commented news

Post a new comment

Follow TechSpot

Feeds & More Newsletter