• AMD A4-4000
Browse 5 reviews so far
  • Excellent:
  • Good:
  • Average:
  • Bad:


  • Better GPU performance than competitors in its price range.


  • Not much l2 cache.
  • Poor 3DMark06 CPU score.

Expert reviews and ratings

By TechSpot on 50

Frankly, the A4-4000 is just too gutless and far too power hungry to even consider in our opinion. If you want to spend less than $50 on a CPU, the Celeron G1610 is a much faster and considerably more fuel efficient choice.

By extremespec.net on

processor AMD A4-4000 has all chances to become a bestseller of the entire family of APU AMD Richland. The first lies in a very nice price tag – the cost model AMD A4-4000 does not exceed $ 40. The second reason is the presence of the integrated video...

By goldfries.com on

The A4-4000 is priced at around RM 170, pair it with a decent board and it still costs you less than RM 400, slap on 2x 4GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM and it's still under RM 600! The A4-4000 is listed on Newegg.com at $45.99, comes to about RM 150. Pretty good...

International Review By overclockers.ru on

Процессоры AMD Richland стали дальнейшим развитием своих предшественников Trinity. За счет более агрессивных тактовых частот они продемонстрировали впечатляющую производительность. Так, модель A10-6800K в номинальном режиме работы обеспечила равные...

International Review By chip.co.id on

Sedikit berbeda dengan keluarga AMD Richland A10, A8, dan A6, prosesor AMD A4-4000 masih menggunakan on-die graphics card AMD Radeon HD 4780D. Hal ini tidak mengherankan, pasalnya keluarga prosesor AMD A4 merupakan kelas entry pada jajaran...