I'd like to see a limit on how large the signature could be...
That includes pictures and text...
I find it quite annoying when the comment from the person is less than half of the size of the persons signature....
The only problem would be proper formatting if you wanted a big picture (in height), and text... (But then again, you could allways take a screengrab of it from Word and use that pic....)
When it comes to pictures, I think there should be a limit of both how big a picture can be in pixels and in
kb's...
IMO, there are two posts in this thread, which easily could have had half as much in their signatures without loosing out on what they wanted to say...
But then again, I tend to like a more simplistic look...
I won't ask for no pictures in the signatures, as that would be taking away part of our users freedom, but limiting the size they have to use will give us a cleaner look (which would go nicely with the new changes)...
I've actually been on the verge of raising this question a couple of times in the past, when I've seen posts with huge images, though I've refrained from saying anything until now...
I think having a very large signature detracts from the rest of the post, as it clutters up the forum with unneccesary text/pictures...
This is not to say that signatures as a whole is a bad thing, only that I think implementing limits to what is allowed will increase the look and quality of the forum.
For some people it almost looks like they think that having a large signature is a way to compensate for being shorter in other places
Kinda reminds me of Poertners "You are not your postcount".....
[size=1]Sorry if this doesn't make sense, I'm a bit tired after 5 days with an average of less than 5 hours of sleep, and
a lot of work... [/size]