also @ TechSpot: EU, US approve Google's $12.5 billion buyout of Motorola Mobility
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > Software > The Alternative OS

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

YOUR favorite Linux flavor?

View Poll Results: Favorite Linux flavor?
Mandrake 1 2.50%
Redhat 6 15.00%
Gentoo 3 7.50%
Debian 6 15.00%
SuSe 6 15.00%
Knoppix 1 2.50%
Slackware 5 12.50%
FreeBSD 0 0%
Fedora 4 10.00%
Other (please name/describe) 8 20.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Page 1 of 4 1 234
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-29-2004
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
Member since: Jul 2004, 282 posts
YOUR favorite Linux flavor?

Personally, I like Mandrake Linux and Debian. Since I haven't used Linux for about six months, I am currently running Mandrake 10.1 Community on one of my boxes, but in a couple of weeks will probably install Debian.

What is YOUR favorite Linux flavor? :giddy:

Where do I recommend downloading Linux ISO's from? LinuxISO

Last edited by Mikael; 12-29-2004 at 12:07 AM..
  #2  
Old 12-29-2004
Mictlantecuhtli's Avatar
TechSpot Special Forces
 
Location: Finland
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,886 posts
System specs
My favorite used to be self-made, but now I think it's just not worth all the resources spent on getting it up and running.

I also used Mandrake 10.1 Community Edition for some months, until KDE just stopped working normally (about 10 minute delays in everything), and I didn't feel like reinstalling it.
  #3  
Old 12-29-2004
me(who else?)'s Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Member since: Nov 2003, 433 posts
I'm running on trusty old RH 9, but I'm going to try to upgrade to Fedora Core 3.

[Thread hijack]
Off topic, does anyone know of a good guide for said operation?
[/Thread hijack]
  #4  
Old 12-30-2004
Nodsu's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Estonia
Member since: Feb 2002, 9,431 posts
System specs
FreeBSD is not Linux.

If you feel like putting x86 unixes into the mix then I suggest additional entries like NetBSD, OpenBSD and Solaris
  #5  
Old 12-30-2004
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
Member since: Jul 2004, 282 posts
On a side note, I just received twenty-five Ubuntu CD's in the mail today. If you decide to receive a few, they kindly send a live CD and an install CD. I'll probably hook-up with a few computer people and see if they want to hand them out. I'll be installing Ubuntu (never tried it before) on a separate HD this weekend, and I will post my experience in a new thread.

me(who else?): Have you found a guide yet? I haven't been able to find any "reliable" guides on the internet. Although, if you use google, you will be able to find a few forum posts on Linux related forums where people have done the same thing that you are attempting to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodsu
FreeBSD is not Linux.
Yes, but I felt like putting FreeBSD up there anyway because I was looking at a friend's FreeBSD avatar at the time I was writing this poll.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mictlantecuhtli
I also used Mandrake 10.1 Community Edition for some months, until KDE just stopped working normally (about 10 minute delays in everything), and I didn't feel like reinstalling it.
Mind telling me what happened? Did this just randomly happen, or were you tinkering with something? I will be quite upset if this happens to me and I wasn't even breaking anything.

Cheers!

Last edited by Mikael; 12-30-2004 at 06:30 PM..
  #6  
Old 12-30-2004
zephead's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Illinois, USA
Member since: Dec 2004, 2,483 posts
System specs
red hat is awesome, i know of a server that has been running redhat linux 7 since january of 2001 and has served it's company well ever since. it's a shame they don't use it more aften, linux is quite powerful/effecient.
  #7  
Old 12-31-2004
Mictlantecuhtli's Avatar
TechSpot Special Forces
 
Location: Finland
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,886 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikael
Mind telling me what happened? Did this just randomly happen, or were you tinkering with something? I will be quite upset if this happens to me and I wasn't even breaking anything.
I hadn't booted it for four or five days, and when I did, it just stalled exactly like here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00274.html

However, doing anything with KDE components (kicker, konqueror, kopete, konsole, ...) would cause the same delay.
  #8  
Old 12-31-2004
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Boom, Belgium
Member since: Dec 2004, 74 posts
Some ten years ago, I tried an early Slackware release, just out of curiosity, but couldn't get beyond character-based consoles. So without any GUI support, I decided to take the opportunity to learn a little about the various Linux commands, try a few kernel compiles, and then forget about it - at least temporarily.
A few years later, I tried some SuSE 6 or 7 release - worked better, but couldn't run the GUI in anything but VGA. Not too impressive.
Then came the SCO case, essentially against Linux. That picqued my interest: If the (would-be) "big guys" started noticing, then it must have become pretty usable, mustn't it?
Thus, in October 2003, I installed Red Hat 9 - found it a smooth transition from Windows, nice reintroduction to Linux, quite usable indeed; but somehow, I never really found it particularly attractive (but, of course, that's a matter of strictly personal opinion).
Next, I tried SuSE 9.0, and, somewhat later on, SuSE 9.1. Nice, looked good to me, but I couldn't really find my way around YaST - it just doesn't sit well with how my brain functions, I guess... Furthermore, I kept getting the feeling that it tried to keep me from jumping too deeply in to the system - it wanted to do everything for me, while I wanted to learn more about how I could configure all these things myself.
So, I remembered Slackware, and decided to give that another try (first 9.1, these days 10.0). I just love it! Doesn't try to make up my mind for me, but lets me make my own decisions - just what I was looking for! (Well, setting up a Linux system from scratch would be another option, but I'm not too sure if I would consider that time well-spent...)
  #9  
Old 01-01-2005
mezzyhandz's Avatar
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Jan 2005, 1 posts
I was using Mandrake 10.0 for the past year, i found it a lot better than FC2, which i installed on my second computer. But just a week ago, i decided to switch to SuSE 9.1, just for the heck of it. And found it equally good (if not better), than Mandrake 10.0. Just cant live without YaST and Mandrake's Setup tools to be honest
  #10  
Old 01-07-2005
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Jan 2005, 15 posts
only thing that sucks about running Linux on here is cant get online cause my gateway modem doesnt have a linux driver! and I am on a laptop!
  #11  
Old 01-07-2005
Newcomer, in training
 
Location: North York Moors
Member since: Jan 2005, 2 posts
Very impressed with Fedora Core 3 on my laptop. Few issues to resolve but that I why I installed it.
  #12  
Old 01-07-2005
MYOB's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Member since: Apr 2002, 527 posts
One thats not running on my hardware. At a push, Fedora based systems or Debian based systems - I don't agree with Debians overly strict free/non-free system, but the packages system beats RPM, and repositories beat stuff like FreshRPM's
  #13  
Old 05-02-2008
Newcomer, in training
 
Location: BA - Argentina
Member since: Apr 2008, 20 posts
System specs
FreeBSD is not linux, but lets put some Unixes like flavors also into the game.

For enterprise use : Redhat, Suse, Centos, OpenBSD, Debian, FreeBSD
For home: Ubuntu, OpenSuse, Fedora, FreeBSD.
  #14  
Old 04-11-2009
spikester48661's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: west Branch,mi.usa
Member since: Sep 2006, 98 posts
System specs
I like UBUNTU 8.10 and SimplyMEPIS-64
  #15  
Old 04-11-2009
rev_olie's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: the lab men wont tell me
Member since: Apr 2006, 598 posts
System specs
I only voted knoppix because the live CD saved all my Data the other day
  #16  
Old 05-13-2009
AndrestheBean's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
Member since: May 2009, 217 posts
System specs
ubuntu is not a option... why???
  #17  
Old 05-14-2009
LNCPapa's Avatar
TechSpot Special Forces
 
Location: Duke University, North Carolina, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 3,231 posts
System specs
Because this thread is 5 years old
  #18  
Old 05-14-2009
captaincranky's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Oct 2006, 7,584 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNCPapa View Post
Because this thread is 5 years old
So basically what you're saying is, that nobody should download and install Fedora 3 to give that a shot?
  #19  
Old 05-14-2009
AndrestheBean's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
Member since: May 2009, 217 posts
System specs
no, they say Ubuntu (the latest version) is the best right now
  #20  
Old 05-14-2009
captaincranky's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Oct 2006, 7,584 posts
Whoops...........

Andres buddy, I think I got you with my little send up. Fedora is on version 10 at the moment. You must read the date on the original Fedora 3 post.

But yes, Ubuntu is a well thought of distro, and fairly easy to install.

Many swear by OpenSUSE also, with it's KDE desktop.

And the Fedora offerings are liked by many.
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 234

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
What's your favorite and least favorite food? 32 General Discussion
My favorite way to dual boot Linux and Windows 0 The Alternative OS
Xp....Which Flavor.......? 1 Windows OS
What is your favorite? 32 General Discussion
xandros linux lover windows/linux programmer (RealBASIC) newbie 2 Introduce yourself

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.