Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > Hardware & Tweaking > Overclocking, Cooling and Modding

My software temp/ physical probe accuracy experiment

Reply
Bookmark / Share this page
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-19-2006
KingCody's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Member since: Oct 2005, 1,559 posts
System specs
My software temp/ physical probe accuracy experiment

Hi all I am hoping that this may help some people who are wondering about the accuracy of software based temp monitoring programs (MM5, speedfan, etc.)

My software temp sensing experiment:

my case has a cheap 3-probe temp sensor built into it. a while after i got it i borrowed an infared thermometer (Extech 42500 Digital IR Thermometer) from my brother in-law to see how accurate my case sensors were. which I could then compare to software based temp monitoring programs.

i had one of the temp sensors glued to the PCB of my AthlonXP 2600+ with the tip of the sensor physically touching the CPU die. also, I wired the case's LCD temp display with a 12v power pack from an old police scanner so that it would stay on constantly, and not shutoff with the PC.

since I obviously could not verify the temp of the die via the IR with the heatsink on, i removed the heatsink (and thoroughly cleaned the die).

to avoid overheating the CPU, I set my mobo set to shut down when the CPU reached 65C (the lowest setting possible). the max die temp for that processor was 95C so I wasn't too worried about it.

I turned on the PC and within seconds it shut down. according to the BIOS setting, that would mean it should have heated up to 65C... yet my temp sensor only read 56C and the IR read 58C. (i will assume that the IR is more accurate than anything else i had access to) that's a difference of 7C. after a few more tries i had found that my temp sensor was always 1C-2C lower than the IR reading (a negligible amount).

I now trusted that my case's display was accurate to within 1C-2C of the IR, which was better than I expected.

i then reinstalled the heatsink and booted into the BIOS. the BIOS read a constant 43C, and my LCD display read a constant 39C (the laser would have read 40C-41C). so that proved (to me) that the BIOS was reading the temp about 2C too high. no big deal, but this wasn't stressing the CPU

i then booted into windows and monitored it through MM5 and speedfan. i ran halo, F.E.A.R., and superPI. the software temps were all over the place. speedfan read 3C-8C higher than my LCD. MM5 stayed more consistent but still read 6C-7C higher.

the bottom line... software temp monitors are not accurate enough to rely on. they can be useful as a "before and after" comparison tool to see if a change in your cooling made any difference, but that's about it.

I hope this was helpful (or at least entertaining.. lol ) hopefully i got all the numbers right because i was going off a notepad file which has the temps on it (i had done this experiment quite some time ago)

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2006
zephead's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Illinois, USA
Member since: Dec 2004, 2,476 posts
System specs
some BIOS programs shut down the system is no processor fan is detected, if you unplugged the HSF from the motherboard this could have caused the system shutdown.
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #3  
Old 07-20-2006
wolfram's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Juarez, Mexico
Member since: Nov 2005, 2,575 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingCody
I hope this was helpful (or at least entertaining.. lol )
It was very helpful, and very very entertaining lol

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2006
KingCody's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Member since: Oct 2005, 1,559 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by zephead
some BIOS programs shut down the system is no processor fan is detected, if you unplugged the HSF from the motherboard this could have caused the system shutdown.
good point, but the shutdown was indeed caused by the CPU overheating. there was a BIOS setting for a "no-fan/fan failure shutdown" however this option was disabled.

thanks for pointing that out

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfram
It was very helpful, and very very entertaining lol
haha, glad to hear it... i think
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2006
wolfram's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Juarez, Mexico
Member since: Nov 2005, 2,575 posts
System specs
Hey Kingcody !

I have a little question for you. My father has a Biostar mobo (I don't remember the model ), and he has a Celeron D (that almost burned out), but his new mobo is reporting a CPU temp of 39°C. That's not correct, because he had a MSI mobo, that reported a 55°C idling temp. Obviously, 39°C is way too cool for a Prescott CPU using stock cooler.

Is there an easy way to know the real CPU temp? How much would it cost?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2006
CMH CMH is offline
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Aus
Member since: Jun 2005, 2,101 posts
Lol, it'll cost a bunch, getting some good equip.

I wouldn't bother, its not giong to be very different from the correct temp. And unless you're going to do something extreme, you wouldn't need to know the correct temp anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2006
wolfram's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Juarez, Mexico
Member since: Nov 2005, 2,575 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMH
Lol, it'll cost a bunch, getting some good equip.

I wouldn't bother, its not giong to be very different from the correct temp. And unless you're going to do something extreme, you wouldn't need to know the correct temp anyway.
Thanks. I think I won't get it It should be expensive. I should better play Half-Life 2 instead of bothering with dumb things

Thanks anyway!
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #8  
Old 08-18-2006
joked u 2's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA!
Member since: Sep 2005, 191 posts
actually if you want some equmient for cheap that works... i don't know if you have a sears around but i got a mulit-meader that has a temp. probe. or you can get a infared heat therometer at
http://xoxide.com/thermohawk-200-inf...ermometer.html
$40 !!1 . any thing more accurate will be expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-19-2006
wolfram's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Juarez, Mexico
Member since: Nov 2005, 2,575 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by joked u 2
actually if you want some equmient for cheap that works... i don't know if you have a sears around but i got a mulit-meader that has a temp. probe. or you can get a infared heat therometer at
http://xoxide.com/thermohawk-200-inf...ermometer.html
$40 !!1 . any thing more accurate will be expensive.
Thanks for the suggestion Fortunately, I have a sears close to my house.
That seems to be a good choice.

I'll see if I can check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-19-2006
joked u 2's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA!
Member since: Sep 2005, 191 posts
ya good the multi meter i got at sears was like $40 and does ac/dc has a temp probe and it auto rangeing and is all didital. also very recentily i have came across a multi meder at either radio shack or harbor freight for like $5 and has an rs-232 input/output. i know someone who has it but i dont think it has a temp probe.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS PC Probe kittiesmama Misc. Software & Utilities 2 06-22-2006 12:46 PM
surf accuracy adware help!!! here is my hijackthis list ttryi Security and the Web 8 03-19-2006 04:11 PM
CPU Temp software. spartanslayer Misc. Software & Utilities 5 12-22-2005 09:41 AM
Software to read my GPU's temp???? Ligar Overclocking, Cooling and Modding 2 12-31-2004 12:28 AM
Software to check Temp AtK SpAdE Overclocking, Cooling and Modding 6 11-24-2004 09:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM.