also @ TechSpot: HDD supply to recover by Q3 2012, prices to remain high
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Community > General Discussion

Begin your free trial now Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month

Satellite Internet Is It Worthwhile?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-17-2002
cabrone's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 166 posts
Satellite Internet Is It Worthwhile?

I currently have qwest dsl and it is beginning to make me mad with the constant down time and frequent disconnects. The speed is good and i get great pings on most servers. But my dad proposed to me the idea of satellite internet.... I have heard a little about it but not too much. My questions are:
  • Is it fast?
  • If it is what company should i go with?
  • I heard about a slow upload via modem or something is this true?
  • any other complaints or comments?
thanks
  #2  
Old 03-17-2002
PHATMAN5050's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: ASU (Tempe, AZ)
Member since: Feb 2002, 645 posts
as stated here
Quote:

DIRECWAY™

This satellite-based Internet service is a great option for customers who don’t live in areas that offer land-based web connections.* DIRECWAY has lightning-fast connectivity with upload speeds up to 128 kbps and download speeds up to 400 kbps. This "always-on" Internet access means you’ll never have to dial up or tie up your phone line.

If you want access to the Internet and DIRECTV® programming** from a single, digital satellite dish, check out DirecDuo™. It offers high-speed Internet connections at up to 400 kbps.

For more information, check out www.direcway.com and www.direcduo.com.


400kbps isn't very fast for a download speed, and as you heard 128kbps is very slow for an upload speed
  #3  
Old 03-17-2002
lokem's Avatar
TechSpot Addict
 
Location: Assembled In Malaysia
Member since: Mar 2002, 773 posts
No matter how fast the satellite downlink is, the uplink is still as fast (or as slow) as your modem gets.

Perhaps the satellite service is different in your country. In mine, you'd still have to dial up to the ISP for the uplink which kinda defeats the purpose.
  #4  
Old 03-17-2002
uncleel's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Location: Naugatuck Valley, CT
Member since: Feb 2002, 1,145 posts
that's correct. You can expect download speeds up to 500 kbps w/ satellite and upload speeds via modem up to 150 kbps.

If you are in a rural area w/o DSL or cable & want broadband access, satellite may be an option. But oh the expense!
  #5  
Old 03-17-2002
svtcobra's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Boston, Ma
Member since: Feb 2002, 875 posts
If I was only able to get Satellite internet I would no matter the price. I couldnt go back to dialup.
  #6  
Old 03-17-2002
SuperCheetah's Avatar
TechSpot Addict
 
Location: Savannah, GA
Member since: Mar 2002, 868 posts
The only way I would get satellite link to the net is if I lived out in the woods somewhere (which I do come from originally ). As posted earlier the upload speeds are pathetically slow and the download speeds aren't exactly impressive either. But if you live in an area without cable or dsl or something better then this is definitely an option.

My hometown has nothing better than dialup which is pretty pathetic I know, but I don't live there anymore and I'm rolling with a cable modem thank goodness

Just my thoughts though...
  #7  
Old 03-18-2002
cabrone's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 166 posts
so basically yer all saying to keep my dsl its better then it seems? fine with me i can deal until we are able to get cable, reason why we cant get cable is because our house lines are too old and if you try and run cable modem and tv it wont work... so a new line is an option but not for my family lol dsl it is then thanks for the help
  #8  
Old 03-18-2002
MrGaribaldi's Avatar
TechSpot Ambassador
 
Location: Babylon 5, Grid Epsilon
Member since: Feb 2002, 2,802 posts
Another thing to remember is the latency you'll experience when using satelite connections....

The signal has to travel up to the satelite, down to the connection senter, to the server, back to the connection senter, back to the satelite, and finally back to you...

Thus it is impossible to play any games (with the possible exception of chess and suchlike) over the net with a satelite connection...

But for regular surfing/downloading it's a much better alternative than dial up and certain xDSL types...
  #9  
Old 03-18-2002
Arris's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,083 posts
System specs
Check out the discussion Rick (jellobones) started in the old forum about this subject since he is out of DSL/Cable range where he resides...

Out of range for DSL - The epic saga of 44.0kbps connections continue
  #10  
Old 03-18-2002
uncleel's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Location: Naugatuck Valley, CT
Member since: Feb 2002, 1,145 posts
DSL or Cable

Quote:
Originally posted by cabrone
keep my dsl
yep. DSL or Cable.
Unless you're rich & can afford a commercial T3 line!
  #11  
Old 03-18-2002
T-Shirt's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Snohomish, Wa. USA
Member since: Mar 2002, 329 posts
I have Satellite via AOL, and it work very well for what it is supposed to do.
I average 650-750 kbps DL over 250-300 hours a month for $43.90
upload is around 28-30kbps via phoneline (since it's oneway on the phone line compression makes it around 60-70kbps) Don't like AOL? just minmize it and run whatever browser you choose.
avoid regular DPC (direcway) the FAP (speed limiter) billing problems, third party "support" makes it almost worthless. Repackaged DPC (AOL,Earthlink, etc. ) works pretty well with no FAP, or usage limits
Now the bad stuff
Ping time is 5-700ms. No good for gaming
2 way sat. (no phone line is still in the PAY FOR BETA TESTING stage (still a lot of problems) and too expensive ($700+60/70 amonth)and doubles ping time.
some weather related outages (heavy rain or slush on the dish may cause a brief loss of signal)
some slowdowns at busy times of day (this is not an AOL problem, but a problem at DPC. ~the Satellite can only handle 12MBPS per channel/per transponder/per Satellite) not really a problem for me
Given a choice I would first go with a good cable system (fastest, cheapest), or DSL (twice satellite speed, midprice)
then Sat.
Any of these choices, relies on a quality provider to make it work well. If you only have qwest (dsl) or AT&T (cable) get Sat. (or just shoot yourself) if you get say roadrunner of hawaii. YOU are the MAN! (really good service there )
Reply

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Worthwhile Computer Upgrades 3 Other Hardware
worthwhile 2 replace fan inside psu? 3 Overclocking, Cooling and Modding
Intel Core 2 Duo 1.86 GHz Upgrade (Worthwhile > AMD 4000+) ? 1 Processors and Motherboards
satellite internet question 2 Storage and Networking
Need a worthwhile upgrade 3 Audio and Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.