TechSpot - PC Technology News and Analysis

Late last year Intel unveiled the world’s first quad-core desktop processor, stealing a bit of thunder from the amazing Core 2 Duo range. For a whopping $999, the new Core 2 Extreme processor would become Intel's new flagship product.

Although the Core 2 Duo remained the best value choice for most desktop users, the technological achievement was nonetheless there as AMD had - and in a way still is - without a proper answer.

The new Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 processor we are testing today is the first Core 2 product to hit the magical 3.0GHz marker, and it is doing it not with two but rather four cores (dual 4MB L2 cache). Also new for the Core microarchitecture is a bumped up front side bus which has been taken to 333MHz QDR (Quad Data Rate – 1333MHz), whereas previous Core 2 processors all used a 1066MHz FSB.

http://www.techspot.com/review/59-in...xtreme-qx6850/

Please leave your feedback here. Thanks!

Im just curious, how does Techspot get the money to buy all this great stuff to review?

And what happens to it after?

Intel sent this CPU for us to review at no charge

That awsome, but what happens to it after its been reviewed?

We cook eggs on it

AhahahA

Good to see Intel still moving up the hertz on the C2D's, but I'm not impressed with the results nor the price. Whats the the energy consumption and heat dissipation?

Just out of curiosity, what exactly would it take to impress you?

The perfect chip:
Its free, it performs anything you ask of it in <1sec, consumes no power at all.

Oh yeah, its also infinitely overclockable.

In a rare oversight on your part, in seems you have forgotten the matching free mobile version and the $25.00 Instant rebate

I wonder if you caught my little joke about infinite overclockability.

Ok so what's the big deal about this thing really? Ok its 1333 fsb which is cool I guess. But can't you just take any of the other quads and put them to 1333 and get the same result. Plus doesn't the high fsb leave less room for overclocking, unless you buy one of those p35/p5k boards, that can be overclocked to 1900fsb+. I'm actually thinking about grabbing a p5k deluxe as we speak, but the cpu doesnt look to impressive comparing to what's alread on the market.

Is that anything like the "Infinite improbability drive"?

What no quad-FX? No bacon with those eggs.

Well the Thermal Design Power is 130w, though under load I estimate that is uses 13% more power than the QX6800 and about 62% more power than the Core 2 Duo E6700.

Mirob I can't tell you how much eggs suck without bacon and as cheap as bacon is becoming these days, I still cannot afford bacon just to have with my eggs.

If I was going to spend $999 on a processor this would be my Christmass present.

First WTF is "Christmass"?
Should you consider using these as stocking stuffers for the rest of us, Intel would give you a much lower price on a thousand. Feliz Navidad! That would be a whole pinata full!

damn that's real nice, 6mb l2 cache, awesome. Not a huge performance boost though with that.

Well, can anything that powerful be made even more powerful?

Certainly not with only four cores.

I was quite impressed by the C2D's when I first saw there performance against AMD's CPU's. But this Q6850 just doesn't impress me when it comes to performance/price ratio compared to other C2D's.

Judging by what I've seen with the benchmarks from the Q6850, it doesn't seem like the higher FSB is playing much of a big part when it comes to performance. You are getting a 12%? performance increase which most of it is probably due to its being higher clocked (3GHz) speed. This isn't exactly showing high hopes for Penryn which a lot of people are craving over because of its 1333FSB.