also @ TechSpot: Microsoft's Indian online store hacked, passwords and user data exposed
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > Site Feedback and Suggestions

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

Post Awards and Ratings

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-30-2007
TimeParadoX's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: DE_Dust 2
Member since: Aug 2006, 2,445 posts
System specs
Post Awards and Ratings

I had a idea while chatting with Rik on MSN, we were thinking about a sort of post rating and award...

Every other month after rating someone, they'll get a award that will appear near their post counts

Awards could be like this:

Most funny
Most Helpful
Worst Poster
Useless Poster

and so on... You can think of some, those are just guides, Also ratings will appear under your post counts with a Smiley face for good poster and a Red-mad face for a annoying useless poster or something

This will also help people determine who is honest and will actually help or if they are just posting to be dumb

The way you could rate people is on their posts ( near where it says #1 or so ) you'll press either a Gold Star ( Good Helper), Smiley Face ( For Funny ), Mad Face ( bad ) and so on

Last edited by TimeParadoX; 09-30-2007 at 05:33 PM..
  #2  
Old 09-30-2007
Rik's Avatar
Rik Rik is offline
Banned
 
Location: UK-Maidenhead
Member since: May 2005, 4,987 posts
System specs
I think its a good idea, i cant take any credit for it tho, it is all TP's idea.

I seem to remember that TS did once have something along those lines but it was small and hard to spot.
  #3  
Old 09-30-2007
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Aug 2004, 25,949 posts
We tried a rating system not too long ago, called the Karma system. It didn`t work out too well and was the cause of some very disgruntled posting.

http://www.techspot.com/vb/topic69824.html

In the end, it was decided to get rid of it.

I have a feeling that any other system of post rating, would end up the same way.

With that in mind, perhaps it`d be better to leave things as they are.

Regards Howard
  #4  
Old 10-01-2007
Rik's Avatar
Rik Rik is offline
Banned
 
Location: UK-Maidenhead
Member since: May 2005, 4,987 posts
System specs
How about if we had a system for only reporting good posts?

Informative, well written, funny, that kind of thing?
  #5  
Old 10-01-2007
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Aug 2004, 25,949 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rik
How about if we had a system for only reporting good posts?
Reporting them to whom mate?

Regards Howard
  #6  
Old 10-01-2007
AlbertLionheart's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: UKkers
Member since: Jun 2007, 2,706 posts
System specs
The thread cops, who else?
  #7  
Old 10-01-2007
Rik's Avatar
Rik Rik is offline
Banned
 
Location: UK-Maidenhead
Member since: May 2005, 4,987 posts
System specs
They go under cover, they wear casual threads!
  #8  
Old 10-01-2007
AlbertLionheart's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: UKkers
Member since: Jun 2007, 2,706 posts
System specs
threadware - now there's an idea!
BTW - can I join LAN?
Also - why has Howard got the hump about HTJ logs?
  #9  
Old 10-01-2007
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Aug 2004, 25,949 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlbertLionheart
why has Howard got the hump about HTJ logs?
It`s nothing to do with me having the hump mate.

I`ve been doing HJT logs etc for a very long time. They`re very very time consuming and due to factors like other commitments, health issues and the fact I have grown tired of doing them, I decided to call it a day.

Regards Howard
  #10  
Old 10-01-2007
Rik's Avatar
Rik Rik is offline
Banned
 
Location: UK-Maidenhead
Member since: May 2005, 4,987 posts
System specs
Anyone that wants to join LAN, just add it to yer sig.

Altho, i have been toying with renaming it to League Against Symantec or LAS for short.

Threadware, lmao.

Last edited by Rik; 10-01-2007 at 08:50 AM..
  #11  
Old 10-01-2007
AlbertLionheart's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: UKkers
Member since: Jun 2007, 2,706 posts
System specs
Howard - you have done more than your share of these things: trouble is, you are the expert.

Rik - *** = Anti Symantec Software - or maybe **** - Anti Rubbish Symantec Software.

edit - oops - didn't know that words referring to bottoms were kicked out automatically. Will it kick out bottoms I wonder?

Last edited by howard_hopkinso; 10-01-2007 at 09:08 AM..
  #12  
Old 10-01-2007
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Member since: Aug 2004, 25,949 posts
That`s as maybe, but I`ve made my decision and that`s it.

In any case, I don`t think this thread is the correct place to discuss it really.

Back on topic guys please.

Regards Howard
  #13  
Old 10-01-2007
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,812 posts
System specs
I've always been a fan of a rating system, because I don't agree with some poster's take on problem solving or their advice, and I think others agree with me. I think it can be a very helpful and informative addition to a forum.

Problem is, it just doesn't work here. I think people have to join a forum that already has it for it to be accepted. The backlash on our attempt to have it here was astonishing to me. So, I don't think I can get behind any type of rating system here anymore - there were some people that had real hate for it last time and I don't want to see that division between supporters and those against it again.
  #14  
Old 10-01-2007
Julio's Avatar
TechSpot Executive Editor
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Feb 2002, 5,352 posts
System specs
I may look into this more extensively in the near future. With the experience of the previous trial I believe we should only look for a system that gives positive scores to posts/users and not negative. As for categorizing the scoring or posts, that is another approach for which I would have to see if there is an available add-on which does that kind of thing since we don't develop any vb plugins in house (other than minor modifications to existing ones, and so on).
  #15  
Old 10-01-2007
AlbertLionheart's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: UKkers
Member since: Jun 2007, 2,706 posts
System specs
As a relative newcomer to the forum, I personally do not think anything is broken so would therefore council against fixing it.
One potential danger arising from any form of marking is eliteism - at worst this might mean new posts being sent direct as pms to the "most expert", thus denying the rest of us the benefit of seeing what the experts have to advise and overloading the chosen few with queries.
Actually, I am surprised this does not happen already.
  #16  
Old 10-01-2007
poertner_1274's Avatar
secroF laicepS topShceT
 
Location: Saint Louis, MO, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,742 posts
System specs
It does happen. I'm sure quite a few of the Mods get PM's all the time, as I do. But typically my resonse is to post in in the forums so everyone can gain from the general knowledge.
  #17  
Old 10-01-2007
Rik's Avatar
Rik Rik is offline
Banned
 
Location: UK-Maidenhead
Member since: May 2005, 4,987 posts
System specs
Ive had it happen too and i do exactly the same as poetner_1274.
  #18  
Old 10-01-2007
AlbertLionheart's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: UKkers
Member since: Jun 2007, 2,706 posts
System specs
Weird that - I had my first today. Spooky.
  #19  
Old 10-18-2007
jtickner1's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Member since: Mar 2006, 663 posts
System specs
Good idea, could be good if executed well
Reply

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
News around the web: Vaporware Awards 2009 1 TechSpot News and Comments
Post ratings and count 9 Site Feedback and Suggestions
Tom's Reader's Choice Awards 1 General Discussion
AMD Wins Major Awards At CeBIT 0 General Discussion
Upcoming Interactive Achievement Awards nominees 7 Gaming

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.