Well, I just ran this test and did pretty bad, i wonder what this test measures, i think its the video card, along with the video card you need a pretty good monitor i suppose as well. My score was 1559 marks...lol. I was wondering why it was so bad.
Specs....
Gigabyte GA-K8NSC 939
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice
2 x 512 mb Corsair DDR400
Athenatech Case 350w PSU
Nvidia FX5500
DELL 15 inch CRT [soon to change]
nothing overclocked
this is mine compared to another guys [mine is the lower one..lol]
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=122181_1
EDIT: after doing some research i found out ATI > Nvidia...now i know why my benchmarks were pretty low...and to be fair, i have 100 fps in cs 1.6.
http://techreport.com/etc/2003q1/3dmark03-story/index.x?pg=1
Specs....
Gigabyte GA-K8NSC 939
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice
2 x 512 mb Corsair DDR400
Athenatech Case 350w PSU
Nvidia FX5500
DELL 15 inch CRT [soon to change]
nothing overclocked
this is mine compared to another guys [mine is the lower one..lol]
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=122181_1
EDIT: after doing some research i found out ATI > Nvidia...now i know why my benchmarks were pretty low...and to be fair, i have 100 fps in cs 1.6.
http://techreport.com/etc/2003q1/3dmark03-story/index.x?pg=1
