AMD announces new desktop APUs and (Zen compatible) AM4 socket

By Shawn Knight ยท 4 replies
Sep 5, 2016
Post New Reply
  1. AMD on Monday said desktop PCs featuring Bristol Ridge APUs will arrive in the near future, offering both performance and efficiency improvements over previous desktop-based APUs. What’s likely more interesting here for most isn’t the new APUs but the introduction of the AM4 socket.

    AMD’s seventh-generation A-series chips for entry-level desktops will be offered in eight variants, from the highest-end A12-9800 sporting four cores, a base clock of 3.8GHz and Radeon R7 graphics at 65 watts to the A6-9500E with two cores, a base clock of 3.5GHz, Radeon R5 graphics and a TDP of 35 watts.

    There’s also a non-APU variant called the Athlon X4 950, a quad-core chip clocked at 3.5GHz and a 65 watt TDP.

    AMD says its new APUs offer as much as 17 percent higher processing performance compared to Intel’s Core i5-6500 and 99 percent better graphics performance. The latter is no surprise as Intel’s integrated graphics have never really been on par with AMD’s. Like Intel’s upcoming Kaby Lake chips, AMD’s new desktop APUs also support VP9 and H.265/HEVC.

    That said, Bristol Ridge chips likely won’t even show up as a blip on enthusiasts’ radars as true hardware hounds are waiting to see what AMD’s upcoming Zen platform has to offer. That’s especially true considering these new chips are still based on the Carrizo architecture and built using the dated 28-nanometer manufacturing process.

    The new AM4 socket, however, is noteworthy as it will run both Bristol Ridge and Summit Ridge (Zen) chips and offer support for DDR4 RAM, USB 3.1 G2, NVMe and SATA Express. Initially, AMD will offer a trio of chipsets: the AMD B350 for the mainstream segment, the AMD A320 for the essential crowd and the AMD X/B/A300 for small form factor boards.

    HP and Lenovo will be among the first partners to offer Bristol Ridge-based desktops, AMD said.

    Permalink to story.

  2. EEatGDL

    EEatGDL TS Evangelist Posts: 568   +241

    What is the point of the TBA for enthusiasts if small form factor is already naming it? X/B/A300 -X for enthusiast, B for mainstream... So it's about 90% certain the enthusiast will be X3#0
    wastedkill likes this.
  3. ManuelV

    ManuelV TS Booster Posts: 101   +42

    "Essential for user who need their pc to just work"?, someone in the marketing team hates amd.
    Legionnaire and gamoniac like this.
  4. GreenNova343

    GreenNova343 TS Maniac Posts: 208   +115

    The essential, if you'll notice, is branded as "A320" for standard sizes vs. "A300" for the small form factor, while the mainstream is branded as "B350" vs. "B300".

    So the "TBA" is probably because they haven't decided on the regular-size number. X370? X380? X360? X399 & 44/100? At this point it's simply a guess.
  5. CaptainTom

    CaptainTom TS Maniac Posts: 302   +132

    I want to see Athlon X4 950 reviews NOW. Already in some games Steamroller athlons are coming close to old i5's. The IPC increases may push this new one very close to those $180 i5's when overclocked - which would be a phenomenal deal.

    Furthermore we would finally have something to directly compare to the supposed 40% IPC increase Zen is supposed to bring us.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...