MMDominator88
Posts: 118 +0
so as far as I know, there are the GeForce 8 series with the 8500 GT being the least $$ for DX10 for NVIDIA, but I'm not up to date on the ATI-based DX10 GFX cards...any advice would be greatly appreciated
MetalX said:If you can go DX9, one of the best bang for your buck cards which costs much less is the 7900GS. It costs about $140, and performs incredibly for that price point.
I know, I have one that's why I made the post before your's. Compare:cfitzarl said:If you want a DX10 Video Card for a good price, I would suggest the GeForce 8600-Series. It's cheap and DX10 ! Just make sure you have the correct power in your power supply unit to run it/any other video cards.
What's a X1900GT? Never heard of it.thebaronjocelin said:You can wait on DX10. Period. DX9 is still prevalent, DX10 hasn't even crested the lip of the market. No games really make full use of it, although some make limited use of it's techniques.
Given a few months, the price tag on DX10 will drop considerably as they are bought in greater number, and as DX10 games come into higher demand.
I agree. I just got my system though with Vista Home Premium within the last 6 months and that was the main reason I went with the 8600. Otherwise I would of went with the 7900GS for the same $130.00. It's not that I'm partial to Nvidia but the Ati's were a concern for me because of their power consumption. The X1900XT is probably better but upgrading my psu wouldn't of justified the cost ($140.00).MetalX said:X1900XT maybe?
Anyway... you don't need DX10. thebaronjocelin makes a good point. No games make full use of it, and few make any use at all. And DX10 isn't going to be a massive visual improvement over DX9. If you look at a DX8 game released in say... 2003-2004 and a DX9 game released the same time, you will notice that the visuals on the DX9 aren't mind-bogglingly better than the DX8. It will be the same with DX10.