Congress has accepted $101 million from telecom companies looking to influence policy

midian182

Posts: 9,726   +121
Staff member

Tomorrow is the day that the Federal Communications Commission votes on whether to repeal net neutrality protections. If the FCC gets its way, and it seems almost certain that it will, big ISPs will get to decide who can see what on the internet, how quickly they see it, and how much they’ll pay for the privilege.

The FCC does, of course, claim that the impact of its proposed Internet Freedom Order has been exaggerated and that it will help improve competition while stopping the government from interfering with the internet.

But like pretty much everything in this world, the whole situation comes down to one thing: money. To illustrate this point, The Verge has given a breakdown of how much cash the telecommunications industry gave to sitting members of Congress and their leadership PACs between 1989 and 2017. While nearly 30 years is a long time, $101 million is a lot of donation money.

Looking at how much each party received from that amount, it seems the Republicans lead the way with $55.8 million, though the Democrats aren’t too far behind with their $45 million. The rest of the donations, which isn’t very much at all, went to Independents.

Unsurprisingly, the big three telecoms firms were the most generous donors. AT&T handed over $19.8 million, Comcast gave $14.9 million, and Verizon donated $11.2 million during the 28-year period, all in the hope of “influencing” political decisions.

The Verge also looked at the 535 individual members of Congress who received ISP donations. Top of the list is Senator John McCain, who got just over $2.5 million. A total of 11 members of Congress received over $1 million from the telecom companies.

You can see a full breakdown here.

It was revealed yesterday that over 20 internet pioneers including Tim Berners-Lee and Vint Cerf had signed an open letter urging the FCC to abandon tomorrow’s vote.

Permalink to story.

 
Kind of negligible donations, considering it comes from companies that make billions annually.
 
I can tell you for a fact that the telecoms have given FAR more payola to Congress than this, but mostly through shady back channels. If you factored in those stealth payments the total would be closer to 400 million.
 
For what reason is lobbying allowed in US politics apart from the people in power are corrupt and love money?
 
For what reason is lobbying allowed in US politics apart from the people in power are corrupt and love money?

The Constitution guarantees all of us the right to lobby, along with the right to practice religion freely, to express our opinions in public and to rally for a cause. It’s all in the First Amendment

(First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.)

That right to “petition the government for redress of grievances” applies to all of us, rich or poor, business owners or labor unions. The Supreme Court said in a 1967 case:

U.S. Supreme Court (1967): [The] rights to assemble peaceably and to petition for a redress of grievances are among the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights. These rights, moreover, are intimately connected, both in origin and in purpose, with the other First Amendment rights of free speech and free press.

-I do not, nor have I ever, agreed with in any form or fashion of lobbying. I think it is disgusting, and I have no clue how you are supposed to consider a corporation a 'person' with the right to free speech, and the right to directly put money into the pockets of politicians in order to lean heavily on written laws... it's really absurd, especially in 2017.

TLDR; It's because of lawyer speak. Only a lawyer could interpret that one sentence and somehow we end up with lobbying.
 
Last edited:
Back