Huawei's Mate X foldable phone looks way better than Samsung's Galaxy Fold

Julio Franco

Posts: 9,097   +2,048
Staff member
Forward-looking: Huawei is making a splash at this year's MWC by debuting its own foldable phone that the company says is 5G ready. The Mate X is set to rival Samsung's Galaxy Fold, as the kind of unattainable, expensive, and for the time being, hands-off device that is all about showing off. Huawei's first-generation take on the foldable phone however looks more polished and usable than Samsung's $2,000 offering.

When folded the Huawei Mate X looks like a "normal" phone that has two screens, front and rear. Open it up, and it looks like a razor-thin 8-inch tablet with narrow bezels on three of its sides that begs to be used for watching video and taking full advantage of the larger footprint. Seen in action it makes complete sense a foldable phone should work like this.

The Mate X is packing two screens. A main 6.6-inch display and a secondary 6.4-inch one on the back. When unfolded, the Mate X turns into a 8-inch panel (8:7.1, 2480 x 2200 resolution) that is only 5.4mm thick. Folded the phone measures in at 11mm, which is considerably better than the Fold's 17mm, but is still a tad bigger than current flagships like the iPhone XS (7.7 mm) and Galaxy S10 (7.8 mm).

On the spec sheet side, the Mate X is powered by Huawei's own Kirin 980 SoC, 8GB of RAM and comes with 512GB of internal storage. A 4,500mAh battery and 5G connectivity are standard, the latter provided by a modem developed in-house called Baolong 5000 that the company says is faster than Qualcomm's alternative. The device will also have 55W SuperCharge, with claims that the Mate X can charge up to 85% of its battery in 30 minutes.

There is no in-screen fingerprint reader on the Mate X, instead it relies on the power button that resides on the narrow bar on the right/back that also houses three Leica cameras.

So far all foldable phone implementations have looked clunky or at best alpha-stage. In fact, people were surprised when Samsung announced they planned to sell the Fold -- though few are expected to buy the thing -- it could be Samsung's way to say their hardware and software is production-ready, even if comes at the cost of user friendliness and usability. But Huawei is also expecting to sell the Mate X mid-2019 for nothing less than €2,299.

It should be noted than neither the Mate X nor the Galaxy Fold have been made accessible to the press to actually touch, use and get a feeling of the phones. The folding action and software support on both look very natural, which is great, but in real usage scenarios, we wonder if there are major drawbacks to the display section that is behind the hinge. When looked at directly with a bright image on display, the screens look flawless, but at an angle, with light hitting the display you can clearly observe weird refractions that could compromise usability, but that remains to be seen.

Permalink to story.

 
Apparently the screen is soft plastic instead of hard glass and it's hard to see what kind of case you could use to protect it from scratches.
 
It should be noted than neither the Mate X nor the Galaxy Fold have been made accessible to the press to actually touch, use and get a feeling of the phones.
That's where I'd assume that the fold is not as nice as they want you to believe. Certainly looks like it will be an annoying phone from a few different angles...

Apparently the screen is soft plastic instead of hard glass and it's hard to see what kind of case you could use to protect it from scratches.
It's not that hard to see; you can't protect it all from scratches. At least not in the traditional ways, or the whole screen. Best thing right now that I see would be just have soft plastic where it bends (inbetween the glass protection) and let that take the beating.
 
#1 I trust samsung to make a quality device moreso than any other android maker.

#2 I'll wait till Apple makes a foldable because perhaps, by then, they'll actually come up with reasons why I "need one".

These aren't smartphones.

These are foldable tablets.

Right now I see no need for them beyond watching videos.

I personally do not like browsing the net or replying to emails on tablets as much as my iPhone.

And I just got the new iPad with a keyboard attahment.
 
Well, I can't afford it, I don't need it, and as a citizen of the USA, I'm don't think I'm allowed to have it. Three strikes and it's out. (n) (N) (After all, I don't want my neighbors calling the NSA telling them I must be a Chinese spy, because they saw me with a Huawei "device". (Not that I think for a minute they can spell "NSA")).

Although......, "once upon a time", there were CRT monitors which were rugged enough to use as basketball backboards. But now, all you do is hear millennials whimpering about how, "I dropped my phone and shattered the screen". Along with, "we need tougher glass, so we can drop them down a flight of concrete steps, and they won't break".

Speaking for myself, having experienced the fragility of LCD panels first hand, I find it nigh on unbelievable that material science has advanced to the point that the pixel cells on the fold line, aren't going to be crushed or deformed in short order.

After all, the pictures appear to be showing the display to be continuous, even as the screen is in mid-fold.
 
I am very surprised at the number of phones that bend with the display to the outside, subjecting it to all sorts of damage. Considering the price they want you would expect a little more professional engineering!
 
If these sources here are to be believed:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/30/tech/samsung-china-tech-theft/index.html
https://www.zdnet.com/article/lg-di...ith-huawei-lenovo-for-foldable-phones-report/
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2018/11/samsung-curved-display-tech-stolen-china.html

Looks like it's based on stolen tech. Basically some Chinese firm paid Toptec Co Ltd., a company that makes machines to manufacture Samsung's components and tech, for $13.8 million worth of technical drawings and documentations. The company does have a non-disclosure contract with Samsung but apparently got around it by using a shell company. The firm then sold stolen tech information to BOE, a Chinese screen manufacturer, and Huawei. This was several months ago. It's rather suspicious considering how Huawei revealed this phone only several days after Samsung revealed theirs.

I agree the design is aesthetically better than Samsung. But if it's true that it's stolen tech, it must be nice and fun to have to only work on making it look good instead of actually research and developing the core tech. In terms of practicality, I'm not sure I'm fond of the screen folding outwards. Protecting the screen will be a PITA.

I'm starting to be more and more wary of Huawei's products. I was even thinking of buying a Huawei Mate Book X Pro a few months back...
 
Why are they bothering with these stupid, awkward folding tablets. Just put a bendy screen on a normal phone so when it’s dropped or I put it in my pocket and sit on it that it doesn’t break.
 
At some point companies have to reconsider the cost of doing business in China if it means their IP is going to be stolen and cheap knock offs made. But hey, the cost savings must be more then the cost of the R&D so let samsung lay in the bed it made.
 
This bigger screen is good for browsing and reading in general, but when it comes to movies it is useless in this format. Videos are a huge part of a good smartphone and this device is not suited for videos when unfolded. Do better huawei.
 
Main unfloded screen is full of wrinkles and looks loose. Have fun touching and swiping that. Should be like caressing a grandmas cheek.
 
Pass...the conversion between euro's and dollars, says over $2,600 dollars...Plus, living in the USA, owning and operating one of these would probably get you a drone strike from the CIA LOL.
 
At some point companies have to reconsider the cost of doing business in China if it means their IP is going to be stolen and cheap knock offs made. But hey, the cost savings must be more then the cost of the R&D so let samsung lay in the bed it made.
I'm having a hard time coming to the same conclusion that you've reached, but only for this particular device.

If it's from stolen tech, and Huawei's US market is drying up, why would they (ostensibly), place the list price $600.00 higher than the Samsung's equivalent?

I have a couple of ideas, but I'm wondering if you'll find them logical.

1: They set the price high to cover up the fact the tech is stolen.

2: They have a flock of Chinese millionaires ready to snap up the 1st run of these up.

3: Either the price is misquoted in the article, or

4: That's just the inflated list price, and they'll be $499,95 when they hit the market.
 
Last edited:
Don't you like grandma? At least she doesn't have whiskers. I hope.
Grannies do have whiskers, but they don't give up on plucking them until after about 80 or so.

OTOH:
$
 
All these foldable phones feel like things the companies regret spending all that time and money on developing - all to chase after some "industrial designer's dream" that was never based in reality or practicality.
 
I'm really skeptical about the durability of the hinge and whether a noticeable crease will eventually appear on the screen. Especially since they didn't even let you touch it.
 
I'm having a hard time coming to the same conclusion that you've reached, but only for this particular device.

If it's from stolen tech, and Huawei's US market is drying up, why would they (ostensibly), place the list price $600.00 higher than the Samsung's equivalent?

I have a couple of ideas, but I'm wondering if you'll find them logical.

1: They set the price high to cover up the fact the tech is stolen.

2: They have a flock of Chinese millionaires ready to snap up the 1st run of these up.

3: Either the price is misquoted in the article, or

4: That's just the inflated list price, and they'll be $499,95 when they hit the market.

I'd wager they set the price to what they believe they can get away with, same as samsung. Whether a tech is stolen or not does not factor into making a final price decision.
 
Ever since Koday announced organic LEDs that could be printed, I've been waiting for a Taelon phone:
http://www.technovelgy.com/graphics/content08/readius-cell-phone-final-conflict.jpg

I'd settle for an epaper device like Readius. There just isn't that much that needs a color high rez PHONE display and with advances in the other electronics it could be smaller and still include a camera, by simply removing the unneeded "smart" features. .
https://www.slashgear.com/3gsm-epaper-gets-real-with-polymer-visions-readius-123866/
 
This company is suspected of putting spying software on their pones and selling phones to terrorists and to Iran illegally which has sanctions against it for supporting terrorists. Does this website support terrorism?
 
One of my friends has a Huawei smartphone (I do not live in the USA) and he has many problems with it. It was cheaper than Samsung, but often when he talks on it and it moves a bit, his call gets cut off.

Anyway, here, it is considered cheaper and less good than Samsung. BTW, I am not plugging Samsung, I have a LG G6.
 
I guess the folding screen is out of the question. These new phones look neat but we all here know the real issues. The get dropped and what happens they crack, they don't work an etc. Were the heck is the transparent cell phones they don't even seem to be even out yet. 2020 they're still paying with the old tech. Transparent plastic you can drop them you don't have to worry about buying additional case to protect that cell that you wanted to be thin but now it's bulky because you have to protect it from damage. This how is this folding cell into tablet going to manage not to get busted? What sort of folding case we're going to have to buy to make it safe to use 100%. What car vent going to be able to handle the additional weight? Well it stay or well it fall off your windshield because it way to heavy for the suction cup holder. Gimmick for now realistic not yet.
 
Back