My Oc'd 64 3200+ gets worse benchmarks than stock

[not-so-pwner]

I have an Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice) I overclocked it to 2.2ghz (did everything right.) and it got 29,839 aquamarks. I did the test again but with the stock 2ghz and got 35,395 aquamarks. Does anyone know how this happened? I'm thinking is my ram.

AMD Athlon 3200+ (SKT 939 Venice)
ECS Nforce4-A939 mobo
XFX Geforce 6600 256mb (PCIx16)
1GB Corsair Value Ram PC3200
Zalman CNPS7700 heatsink (runs at 35 degrees idle overclocked)
Windows XP Home SP2

 

[Quack 4]

Can you post some details to your ram timing? HTT and RAM speed would be useful as well.

 

[not-so-pwner]

Alright
Ram timing is (accoding to cpuz)

CAS@ Lat: 3
Ras# to Cas# lat: 3
Cycle Time: 8
Bank Cycle: 11
DRAM Idle Timer: 16

The HTT and Ram Speed are the same as the FSB
200mhz at a 2GHZ processor clock speed
215mhz at 2.15GHZ processor (what im running now)
and 220mhz at 2.2GHZ processor

my processor's FSB is stock 200mhz and it has a multiplier of 10.0

Here are my CPU-Z Validation pages
2GHz
2.15GHZ
2.2GHZ

 

[Quack 4]

Strange,

I couldn;t tell what is wrong. have you tried other benchmarks like 3dmark2006? Are you getting the same kind of difference?

 

[not-so-pwner]

I havent tried any 3DMark tools. I havent gotten around to testing it but tonight I will. Ill post the results tomorrow morning or afternoon. Ive never seen something like this happen before. My friend overclocked his Pentium D and he got a huge boost.

 

[not-so-pwner]

I ran Aquamark3 again. This time at 2.25 ghz
Clocks
CPU: 2250.1mhz
FSB: 225.01 mhz
RAM 225.01 mhz
PCIE: 100mhz
PCI: 33.34 mhz

Aquamark3 scores
2ghz 35,395, 35.4fps, 10,655,191 triangles/sec
2.2ghz 29,839, 29.84fps, 8,982,661 triangles/sec
2.25ghz 36,400, 36.4fps, 10,957,758 triangles/sec

I must have had cpuz and pcwizard running when I tested it at 2.2 ghz. Simple mistake. Ill try out 3Dmark06/05 just to make sure.

at 2.1 ghz i have 991 3dMarks in 3dMark06