The AI boom is more overhyped than the 1990s dot-com bubble, says top economist

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,985   +56
Staff
The big picture: As tech giants pour more money into AI, some warn that a bubble may be forming. Drawing comparisons to the dot-com crash that wiped out trillions at the turn of the millennium, analysts caution that today's market has become too reliant on still-unproven AI investments.

Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, recently argued that the stock market currently overvalues a handful of tech giants – including Nvidia and Microsoft – even more than it overvalued early internet companies on the eve of the 2000 dot-com crash. The warning suggests history could soon repeat itself, with the buzzword "dot-com" replaced by "AI."

In the late 1990s, numerous companies attracted venture capital in hopes of profiting from the internet's growing popularity, and the stock market vastly overvalued the sector before solid revenue could materialize. When returns failed to meet expectations, the bubble burst, wiping out countless startups. Slok says the stock market's expectations are even more unrealistic today, with 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratios now exceeding the peak of the dot-com bubble.

A company's P/E ratio measures the relationship between its stock price and the profit it generates, with a high ratio reflecting optimism about future returns. Comparing S&P 500 ratios at five-year intervals from 1990 to 2025 clearly shows the dot-com spike in 2000. Similar spikes in 2020 and 2025 suggest the AI bubble may be even more pronounced.

What's more concerning is that in each spike, the top 10 companies' ratios far exceed the rest of the index. Such disparity suggests investments in those firms – mostly tech giants heavily betting on AI – have detached from reality before their newest technology can generate real profits. Companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet (Google), and Tesla account for most of the S&P 500's recent growth.

Slok's warning echoes concerns from other industry leaders about the risks facing AI companies. Robin Li, CEO of Chinese internet giant Baidu, predicted that only about one percent of AI firms will survive if and when the bubble bursts. He said this will eventually lead to a more stable market with more realistic AI applications.

Tech giants continue to make massive investments as AI's popularity grows, underscoring the high stakes in this rapidly evolving field. OpenAI is developing an AI-powered web browser to challenge Google Chrome's dominance. Meta is spending over $60 billion to build new AI data centers. Microsoft recently cut 9,000 jobs to offset costs from its new AI infrastructure, estimated at $80 billion. Amazon has unveiled plans for agentic AI, signaling that the race for AI leadership shows no signs of slowing.

Permalink to story:

 
Could not agree more. I've been saying this since the bubble began and the same people laughing me off now are the same people who laughed me off when I said crypto was a bubble. Just wait. Like crypto, AI isn't going away but anyone who thinks it's advancing or is even now in the place the bros claim it is, just wait.
 
Could not agree more. I've been saying this since the bubble began and the same people laughing me off now are the same people who laughed me off when I said crypto was a bubble. Just wait. Like crypto, AI isn't going away but anyone who thinks it's advancing or is even now in the place the bros claim it is, just wait.


Right… the problem with declaring something to be “a bubble” is that even if it’s true that a bubble is due to burst, none of the naysayers (yourself included) ever seem to know when exactly the bubble bursts. It could be 3 days from now, 3 weeks, 3 months, 3 years, 30 years; financial markets have historically been reliably unpredictable (since literally any financial instrument can be viewed in any timeframe), and any snippet of price data can be cherry picked to fit a narrative.

Sure, the dotcom bubble burst, but most people who held onto those stocks instead of panic selling is surely better off today than they were before buying. Same with crypto. Saying the bubble is going to burst without saying when or at what price point seems kind of pointless.
 
Could not agree more. I've been saying this since the bubble began and the same people laughing me off now are the same people who laughed me off when I said crypto was a bubble. Just wait. Like crypto, AI isn't going away but anyone who thinks it's advancing or is even now in the place the bros claim it is, just wait.
Crypto was a bubble? Even tho bitcoin is worth over 100k each now?

Might need to rethink that.

AI is definitely not a bubble, this economist is wrong. There are definitely instances where it's overhyped or used as a marketing term and nothing more, but overall it's definitely not overhyped.

With the dot com bubble, everyone wanted to be the next Google but we don't need 100 Googles, so all the other Googles went out of business. But with AI there won't be a shortage of usage for it.

But that doesn't mean there aren't instances of investors making poor investment decisions based on hype, but that is not at all unique to AI.
 
Last edited:
Even more beautiful is how many people they're gonna fire now cuz "AI-AI-AI", and how many people will lose their jobs when this thing bursts.

Oh the world's gonna be in ruins if all this takes long enough
 
Right… the problem with declaring something to be “a bubble” is that even if it’s true that a bubble is due to burst, none of the naysayers (yourself included) ever seem to know when exactly the bubble bursts. It could be 3 days from now, 3 weeks, 3 months, 3 years, 30 years; financial markets have historically been reliably unpredictable (since literally any financial instrument can be viewed in any timeframe), and any snippet of price data can be cherry picked to fit a narrative.

Sure, the dotcom bubble burst, but most people who held onto those stocks instead of panic selling is surely better off today than they were before buying. Same with crypto. Saying the bubble is going to burst without saying when or at what price point seems kind of pointless.
So the way I interpret bubbles is that "it's just a bad time to invest." The way I invest is that when I already made a bunch of money, I sell and I put the money into other emerging markets. I sold nearly all of my nVidia stock earlier this year, I still have some but I'm plenty happy with the gains I've made and If I'm wrong and they go to 8 trillion, I wont care. When someone says something is a bubble I wouldn't exactly say you should sell, just that you probably shouldn't buy it right now. Like you said, people who held onto tech stocks through the dotcom crash are doing just fine right now.
 
The best investment is made after there is "blood on the streets". Invest in those that remain after it pops, just like after DotCom.

Like the internet, AI is only in its infancy.
 
Back