IH8PunkRok
Posts: 113 +0
of course im talking about dual core processors.
which one is better or are either of them worth buying?
which one is better or are either of them worth buying?
F1N3ST said:Im stayin out of this one, _Fake_ please do the same so i dont have to respond
Right. I was thinking of the PCMark tests or Sandra benchmarks and also 3dmark tests all in seperate charts vs price. Could also throw in power consumption. Like I said I don't want to do it, but if people are going to argue in a thread, stuff like that would be good to back up their point.CMH said:Price/performance charts are hard to come by, because there's just so many ways of measuring performance.
...
If you really want those price/performance charts, make them yourself. Performance charts can be found at www.tomshardware.com, and you should be able to grab the prices off your local computer shop, or wherever you want to buy your rig from.
MetalX said:All we really need is for tomshardware.com to include prices of CPUs in their CPU charts. That would be exactly what you guys are looking for.
great value there, no overclock potential IMO
CMH said:I'll rephrase that:
The higher end chips have no overclock potential. Try overclocking a 5000+
CMH said:Well, I've been going by some reports that AMD's chips are being pushed to their limits, so I'm quite surprised you can get those overclocks.
Alls good then, AMD's for the value range!!
F1N3ST said:AMD cant overclock well, intel is better at OCing, it is a FACT.