AMD Radeon HD 7750 1GB GDDR5 PCIe

Metascore

TechSpot Metascore

Based on 11 expert reviews

Excellent:

0
Good:

3
Average:

2
Bad:

6

Pros:

Cheap.
Usable on almost any PC.
Efficient power usage.

Cons:

Not fast enough to play at full HD.
Performance rarely surpasses that of older cards that cost only slightly more.

Last revision on February 19, 2014

Editors Liked

Cheap
Usable on almost any PC
Efficient power usage
Does not block a second expansion slot
Does not require a separate power supply plug

Editors Didn't Like

Not fast enough to play at full HD
Performance rarely surpasses that of older cards that cost only slightly more

Expert reviews and ratings

By Expert Reviews on August 29, 2012 80

It may now be bigger and need external power, but AMD's tweaks to the HD 7750 make it a capable budget graphics...

By PCWorld New Zealand on May 17, 2012 70

Following on from our look at AMD’s latest úber-powerful graphics cards from their HD 7900 series, we now cast a glance down towards the other end of the performance spectrum at the HD 7700 series.Aimed towards HTPC (Home Theatre PC) users...

By DigitalVersus on March 01, 2012 60

Power consumption is well controlled on this card and is lower than the old generation. Nevertheless performance in gaming isn’t as good as expected and it only just merits a three-star rating....

By PC Pro on February 15, 2012 67

A disappointing price means this relatively weak card holds little appeal for...

By Bit-tech.net on February 15, 2012 51

The game test results the HD 7750 1GB posted are disappointing in that they in no way suggest AMD's new budget graphics card is a worth upgrade from other popular low end models such as the HD 5770 1GB or GTX 550 Ti 1GB. In fact, both bettered it in...

By TechRadar on February 15, 2012 80

If AMD's HD 7970 debut Southern Islands card arrived in a fancy tux heralding a bunch of world firsts (first PCIe 3.0 card, first DirectX 11.1-compatible), this HD 7750 turns up to little fanfare in a Burton polo shirt and trainers. The new Graphics...

By PC Mag on February 14, 2012 60

Its $109 list price is the only irresistible thing about AMD Radeon HD 7750, an almost-budget card that can’t keep up with previous generations’ champs....

By uk.hardware.info on February 04, 2013

Today Futuremark released a new version of its popular 3DMark benchmarking software, which has been part of the standard Hardware.Info tests since the first version appeared in 1999. Futuremark seems to be taking a cue from Apple with the name this...

By uk.hardware.info on December 03, 2012

When we review a new graphics card on Hardware.Info and list the benchmark results, the charts also include other cards from the current and previous generation to put things in perspective. We typically don't go back further in time to avoid...

By GoldFries on April 29, 2012

I thought I give the HD 7750 CFX setup a try, considering the card is quite cheap, has low power consumption and could possibly be a decent setup. This review was made possible by Asus Test Setup The computer setup used for this review. ...

By X-bit Labs on April 24, 2012

The AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition and Radeon HD 7750 graphics cards have come to replace the Radeon HD 6770 and HD 6750 and are indeed faster, yet not fast enough to compete with Nvidia’s previous-generation solutions, particularly the GeForce...

By MadShrimps on March 23, 2012

The new Radeon HD 7750 card from AMD comes with the 28nm GCN architecture, lower power consumption and interesting features found on the high end 7970 like ZeroCore Power, PCI-Express 3.0, Eyefinity or full support of the HDMI (for 4K resolutions)...

By Expreview on March 09, 2012

As the successor of Radeon HD 6750, Radeon HD 7750 outperforms the former by 15%, so the card is quite competent. In consideration of 30% price difference between Radeon HD 7770 and Radeon HD 7750, performance gap of 20% is acceptable.Currently Radeon...

By Hardware Secrets on February 17, 2012

The Radeon HD 7750 achieved the same performance level as the GeForce GTS 450 on all the games we ran; it was between 4% and 9% faster than its main competitor on 3DMark 11. The greatest difference between these two video cards, however, was for...

Load More Reviews…