TechSpot is supported by its audience. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Expert reviews and ratings
70
Performance computing and environmental sympathy aren't exactly bum chums. After all, high end chips tend to be power hungry. But what if there was a low-power version of AMD's quad-core processor architecture that gave you the same performance...
All that said, I can’t say anything negative about the 640 or 610e in and of themselves. They performed well in benchmark testing and are delightfully inexpensive for quad-core...
Processor Value To judge performance/value, we gave all our timed benchmarks equal weighting with the top performer, the Core i5-750, given a score of 100 on our performance scale. Similarly, the CPU that delivered the best performance per dollar,...
If you’re considering buying an energy-efficient processor but don’t want to compromise on performance, AMD’s latest three- and four-core offerings, the 415e and 610e, don’t disappoint. Given their price and low power credentials, we don’t hesitate to...
Overall AMD’s 610e X4 delivered exceptional results despite the fact that the processor was built mostly with power consumption and efficiency in mind. In most cases the 610e (when overclocked 10%) outperformed its older brother, the 810 X4. In a...
In the previous article about the Athlon II X4 635, it was concluded that in gaming, the X4 635 had quite a hard time beating the Core i3-530 in the same price range. With today's launch however, the X4 635 is the new sub-$100 Athlon II X4, meaning...
A pesar de que aún no podemos tomar una conclusión definitiva ya que tenemos pendiente el apartado de overclock, es posible decir que AMD renueva buena sangre sus líneas Athlon II, con cuatro procesadores orientados a diferentes mercados...