Mushkin 2.5 inch Callisto Series SATA300

Overview

Reviews

Mushkin 2.5 inch Callisto Series SATA300
-

No Metascore yet

Browse 4 expert reviews so far
  • Excellent:
    0
  • Good:
    1
  • Average:
    1
  • Bad:
    0
TechSpot is supported by its audience. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Expert reviews and ratings

80

These aren’t stellar, nor are they disappointing. SSDs such as Crucial’s C300 perform better, but remember that we’re talking about a 60GB drive with fewer memory channels that still uses the SATA 3 Gbps interface. The Callisto costs a bit more, but...

By ComputerPowerUser on
73

Like most Solid State Drives on the market today, it must be said that the difference between the Callisto and a conventional mechanical drive truly is of night and day. Then again, one would expect that. To be more fair, how did it fair as a SSD?Our...

By Overclock3D on

Muskin's decision to use the SandForce SF-1200 controller in its new SSD line has really turned out to be a good call. With this controller, you will not only get a drive that is capable of 285MB/sec read and 275MB/sec write speeds, but one that...

By Overclockers Club on

If you want a SandForce SF-1200 series controller in your SSD with the 13% over-provisioning firmware that also has the cap on small file writes for better durability then the Mushkin Castillo series is a great...

By Legit Reviews on