Now for the all important real-world testing. Despite being absolutely creamed in the memory bandwidth and synthetic 3D testing, the E6300 using the single-channel ASUS P5VD2-MX motherboard does quite well in X3: Reunion. It was 6fps slower at 1280x1024, but at 1600x1200 this margin closed to less than a frame per second. That said, both E6300 configurations were significantly faster than the Athlon64 3800+. The E6300 system using the Radeon X1950 Pro was around 15fps faster than the Athlon64 3800+ using the GeForce 7900GS.
Although the overclocked Athlon64+ system using the 7900GS was walked all over in X3: Reunion, it did make quite a comeback in Prey to match the E6300 using the X1950 Pro. At 1600x1200 the E6300 was just a single frame per second faster rendering 82fps. The E6700 system using the much faster X1950XTX graphics card defeated the E6300 by just 22fps or 27%.
Again, this time in Quake 4, the overclocked Athlon64 3800+ was able to match the standard E6300 performance-wise. The E6300 using the X1950 Pro was only 18fps slower than the E6700 using the X1950XTX. The single-channel E6300 configuration on the other hand was slower than the non-overclocked Athlon64 3800+ system.
Finally we have UT2004, which tends to show some bias towards Core 2 Duo processors. That being the case, the single channel E6300 system was almost as fast as the overclocked Athlon64 3800+. The dual channel E6300 system on the other hand raced ahead of the pack coming second only to the E6700 system.
From the Forums
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.