Currently quad-core processors offer no real benefits over dual-core processors in games. They do excel however in powerful video editing and graphics design applications. The QX6700 was 10% faster in Adobe Photoshop CS2 when compared to the X6800 while the Q6600 was just one second faster. Those that use this graphic design program using a Pentium D or equivalent can expect to work around 37% faster with a Q6600 processor.
Massive performance benefits were seen in Pinnacle’s Studio Plus as the Q6600 was 34% faster than the X6800. That’s a 34% time saving when rendering videos, which I am sure anyone that uses Studio Plus regularly will really appreciate. What’s more shocking is the fact that the QX6700 was more than twice as fast as the Pentium D 950.
Exporting a high-quality movie from QuickTime took just 7:21 minutes when using the Q6600, making it just 4% faster than the X6800.
Rendering a 3D scene in 3D Studio Max took just 49 seconds when using the Q6600, making it 32% faster than the X6800 and 63% faster than the Pentium D 950. This is once again a massive performance gain and those that use Autodesk’s 3D Studio Max will surely appreciate these kinds of performance gains.
Featured on Processors
Legion Hardware Reviews
From the Forums
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.