Synthetic 3D Performance


Surprisingly the quad-core Q6600 and QX6700 were a lot slower than the two core processors in 3Dmark2001 SE. Although the Q6600 was still much faster than the 3.40GHz Pentium D processor, it did lag behind the E6700 and X6800. The 3Dmark2003 results were however much more competitive.

If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing.
  • Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work
  • Our promise: All reader contributions will go toward funding more content
  • That means: More tech features, more benchmarks and analysis