Home › News › Industry News
Video Game Decency bill rears its head again in 2007
Much to the chagrin of many activists but much to the joy of the game industry, last year the Video Game Decency Act (in the United States) found itself dying with a whimper. It was pushed forward largely due to upset over games requiring re-ratings (such as GTA and Oblivion). While it failed to gain enough support, the bill has been re-written and has now resurfaced, aiming to make hiding certain content in a game from ratings a crime:
As reported by GamePolitics.com, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., last week introduced the Video Game Decency Act of 2007 to the House of Representatives, where it was quickly referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill aims to criminalize any attempt to obtain a less-restrictive age-related rating on a game by failing to disclose the game's true contents to the Entertainment Software Rating Board.
Despite the fact tools are already in place to fine and penalize companies that drop the ball or outright deceive the ESRB for ratings, some feel it isn't enough. You can read the gory details of the proposed bill in the original article.
As reported by GamePolitics.com, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., last week introduced the Video Game Decency Act of 2007 to the House of Representatives, where it was quickly referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill aims to criminalize any attempt to obtain a less-restrictive age-related rating on a game by failing to disclose the game's true contents to the Entertainment Software Rating Board.
Despite the fact tools are already in place to fine and penalize companies that drop the ball or outright deceive the ESRB for ratings, some feel it isn't enough. You can read the gory details of the proposed bill in the original article.
User Comments (1)
Post a comment|
nathanskywalker
on March 21, 2007 6:28 PM |
[quote]The bill aims to criminalize any attempt to obtain a less-restrictive age-related rating on a game by failing to disclose the game's true contents to the Entertainment Software Rating Board.[/quote] That, in itself is a good idea. Not that the government should have much of a say in what games people play, but maybe in how corporations are to rate their games. Let's face it, some games just are not suitable for younger people (and some not for anyone) to be playing, and while it should be the parents responsibility, many simply won't. Then there's that nice little thing about third party software, that doesn't seem to make sense. I'm sure that you could find patches such as those mentioned in the article for mostly any game, so why blame the manufacturer of the original game? [quote]for not disclosing objectionable content.[/quote]Of course, "hidden content", I think, would be a whole different story. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Monitor Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.