Home › News › Industry News
New online tool unmasks Wikipedia edits
Wikipedia has long been the target of numerous companies and individuals which anonymously remove unflattering information from articles to improve their public image. But a new website, built by a Cal Tech grad student, could help bring more accountability to the free encyclopedia by exposing who has been fiddling with their Wikipedia entry.
WikiScanner automatically compares the IP address logged when someone makes an anonymous Wikipedia edit to a public database of IP addresses belonging to all sorts of corporations and government bodies. Among those that allegedly have been polishing their entries are Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, voting-machine company Diebold, ExxonMobil, the CIA, the Vatican, and a slew of other companies. WikiScanner cannot identify the individuals altering Wikipedia articles, though.
"Technically, we don't know whether it came from an agent of that company, however, we do know that edit came from someone with access to their network," said WikiScanner creator Virgil Griffith. "If the edit occurred during working hours, then we can reasonably assume that the person was an agent of that company or was a guest that was allowed access to their network."
Wired News has published an interesting list of the "Most Shameful Wikipedia Spin Jobs," where users can add their own findings or vote on existing ones.
WikiScanner automatically compares the IP address logged when someone makes an anonymous Wikipedia edit to a public database of IP addresses belonging to all sorts of corporations and government bodies. Among those that allegedly have been polishing their entries are Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, voting-machine company Diebold, ExxonMobil, the CIA, the Vatican, and a slew of other companies. WikiScanner cannot identify the individuals altering Wikipedia articles, though.
"Technically, we don't know whether it came from an agent of that company, however, we do know that edit came from someone with access to their network," said WikiScanner creator Virgil Griffith. "If the edit occurred during working hours, then we can reasonably assume that the person was an agent of that company or was a guest that was allowed access to their network."
Wired News has published an interesting list of the "Most Shameful Wikipedia Spin Jobs," where users can add their own findings or vote on existing ones.
Related Stories
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Keyboard Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.