also @ TechSpot: Building a Thin Mini-ITX PC: Small and Silent Performance

› ›

AMD Barton XP3000+ Review

By Derek Sooman

On February 10, 2003, 5:47 AM

Thanks to Th3M1ghtyD8, for telling us here, about the review he found here. There is also an interesting read on this here.

[COLOR=royalblue]"We have seen throughout our testing that were the enhanced level 2 cache is utilised the XP3000+ does indeed warrant its performance rating. The XP2800 despite running at a faster true speed is beaten by the XP3000+ in all of the real applications we tested, only losing out in the theoretical tests. When the XP3000+ is run at the same speed as the XP2800 the Barton core wins or is equal across the board. Although the performance gains are not a big as was hopped, the XP3000+ continues to improve on the Athlon’s performance." [/COLOR]

More here, and comments here.

No tags on this story

Post a comment

Post a new comment

Social Login & Guest Posting TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Most Popular

Trending Featured
More Trending Topics

Featured on Smartphones

Downloads and Drivers

Downloads   Drivers  

J. River Media Center 18.0.187

ComicRack 0.9.169

Ashampoo UnInstaller 5.03

Files Terminator Free 2.5.0.11

Advanced Host Monitor 9.50

More Downloads

Latest Discussion

Catalyst Control Center Error 8 replies on Device Drivers

Laptop overheats after coming out of sleep 6 replies on Mobile Computing

No monitor signal 64 replies on Audio and Video

External hard drive not showing up on my MacBook Pro 28 replies on Storage and Networking

Doom remastered in 9600x7211 16 replies on Gaming

More Recent Discussion

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.