Intel releases SandForce-based SSD 330 Series, starts at $89

By on April 16, 2012, 12:45 PM

Just a few short days later than rumors suggested, Intel has officially released the new SSD 330 Series for those who seek a good mix of performance and value. Based on the SandForce SF-2281 controller and bringing the the SATA III 6Gbps interface to Intel's budget line for the first time, the new drives can hit maximum sequential performance of 500MB/s read and 450MB/s writes. Input-output operations per second (IOPS) are rated at up to 22,500 for random 4K reads and 33,000 4K random writes.

That's a significant bump from the 320 Series' claimed sequential read and write speeds of up to 270MB/s and 220MB/s, respectively. On paper, it almost matches even the higher end 520 Series, though in both cases random read and write performance is slower on the new SSD 330 Series.

  Intel SSD 320 Series Intel SSD 330 Series Intel SSD 520 Series
Interface SATA 3Gb/s SATA 6Gb/s SATA 6Gb/s
Sequential Performance (R/W) 270 / 220 MB/s 500 / 450 MB/s 550 / 520 MB/s
Random Performance (R/W) 39.5k / 23k IOPS 22.5k / 33k IOPS 50k / 80k IOPS
Capacities (GB) 40/80/120/160/300/600 60/120/180 60/120/180/240/480
Warranty 5-year limited 3-year limited 5-year limited

The drives are built using Intel's 25nm NAND flash memory and are available in 60GB, 120GB, and 180GB capacities. With prices set at $89, $149, and $243 for each of those sizes, that works out to around $1.25 - $1.40 per gigabyte, which is not bad compared to other SSDs. Unfortunately, whereas the previous 320 came with a five year warranty, the new 330 offers only three to compensate for the lower prices.

For reference, Intel's SSD 520 Series drives are available in 60GB ($110), 120GB ($180), 180GB ($290), 240GB ($345), and 480GB ($800) sizes, with a limited warranty good for five years.

User Comments: 7

Got something to say? Post a comment
Guest said:

Think we'll see under $1 per gb by Christmas?


Are SSD's really worth it???

I mean are SSD's the way to go now.??

Are they reliable enough now to buy one...

I do not have a SSD yet, but been thinking of trying one out.. and keeping my main HD as a backup.

Remove the Main HD, and install SSD, with a clean install..


Guest said:

I had a computer that was about 5 years old (Intel E6300, 2 GB RAM, Win 7 x64) running business applications. I added an Intel SSD 320 series 120 GB drive. This made things feel a little quicker but was not a night and day difference. I recently upgraded the computer to (Xeon E31225, 8 GB RAM, Win 7 x64) and moved over the SSD and everything is lighting fast.

The computer is a system, which is only as fast as it's weakest link. In general if you access a bunch of small files, you will see an improvement, if you access a few large files you may not see much improvement.

captainawesome captainawesome said:

Review please? This is very good news - a SSD is in my 12 month upgrade plan

9Nails, TechSpot Paladin, said:

My motherboard has SATA II interface, would I consider an Intel SSD 520 with an add-on a SATA III card, or is it better to select an SDD that supports SATA II?

dikbozo said:


on April 16, 2012

6:21 PM

Thanks for a good example of what to expect with this type of technology. Too many fanbois expect latest and greatest from incremental advances. Benchmarks on these don't really jive with real world experiences as most of the time computers are usually doing nothing much but waiting.

cliffordcooley cliffordcooley, TechSpot Paladin, said:

Finally prices are getting to my price range I had set for myself 2 years ago ($1 per GB). I must admit, I wasn't expecting such low prices from Intel, thats good news indeed. I may finally go with an SSD by Christmas.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.