3.2 GHz Athlon Power

Phantasm66 · Feb 13, 2002

Great article here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/mainboard/02q1/020211/index.html

Dual Boards From ASUS and MSI

In principle, two processors are better than one. This fact is in line with the approach we've often taken: that you can never have too much performance. Even an Athlon XP 2000+, which is already quite powerful, quickly reaches its limit when dealing with certain applications. This is confirmed by the shop-talk among hardware fans, who like to have their films converted to DVDs in a matter of minutes. In other words, we need more computing power!

Tawhid 1 · Mar 9, 2002

oh that's a great news .I have only 1.6 ghz.
I am watching to go for amd as the cost of intel is very high.

lokem · Mar 9, 2002

Cool... Perhaps the article below should interest you guys as well:

http://www.gamepc.com/reviews/hardware_review.asp?review=xeonvsamp&page=1&mscssid=&tp=

Intel P4 Xeon vs Athlon MP. Although it's a bit old, but I guess it's still a good read. Trying to locate a newer article on this..

TechSpot

3.2 GHz Athlon Power

Phantasm66 Newcomer, in training

Tawhid 1 Newcomer, in training

lokem Newcomer, in training