I totally agree. Comparable performance for alot less $$ IMO better reliability. Every Intel cpu system I've ever owned (which would be 2) has at one point or another crapped out. While all the AMD CPUs I have can still be plopped into their M/Bs and boot right up.sghiznaneck said:Whether or not Intel has the edge on Dual Core processors, I love my AMD. I've been running them in every rig I've owned for 8 years with no problem. When I used Intel, I had some problems, notbig problems but irritating problems.
sghiznaneck said:Intel may be fast, but for gaming I still prefer an AMD. I know it comes down to personal preference, but I put my money on reliablility and performance. For me, it's AMD!!
sghiznaneck said:It's a free country, at least the last I checked. Do you prefer Chevrolet or Ford? Does it matter which one you pick? I believe it's the one which I've had the most luck with and the one which I am happy and satisfied with. To each his own.
MetalX said:Core 2 pwns AMD pretty bad. A 6000+ runs really hot, and inefficient and can barely keep up with the E6600/E6700 Core 2s which are cooler, more efficient, and cost less.
There was a time when AMD was better than Intel for gaming (and pretty much everything) but that time has ended for the moment.
Doza-kun said:Just asking because there is a notebook that I want and it runs AMD, so yeah.