Canon challenges ASML supremacy in chip manufacturing with a new nanoimprint lithography...

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,029   +302
Staff
Forward-looking: Canon is renowned for its printers, cameras, and other imaging products designed for both consumer and industrial use. The Japanese company is now applying its extensive knowledge in optical and imaging technologies to venture into the highly specialized field of advanced chip manufacturing equipment.

Canon recently introduced the FPA-1200NZ2C, a piece of "nanoimprint semiconductor manufacturing" equipment specifically designed for producing microchips and other semiconductor-based components using the latest manufacturing nodes available. Canon's solution for chip manufacturing appears to offer similar capabilities to its competitors but does so with significantly lower power consumption, thanks to its utilization of nanoimprint technology.

Unlike traditional photolithography systems, nanoimprint lithography (NIL) does not rely on an optical mechanism to transfer a circuit pattern onto the resist-coated wafer. Canon's NIL machinery achieves the same outcome by pressing a mask imprinted with the circuit pattern onto the wafer's resist, essentially acting like a stamp, as described by the company.

The FPA-1200NZ2C can handle patterning workloads with a minimum linewidth of 14 nm, a capability that Canon states is comparable to the 5nm manufacturing node necessary for producing today's "most advanced logic semiconductors." Canon anticipates that, with continued enhancements in mask technology, the NIL technique is poised to reach a minimum linewidth of 10 nm (equivalent to a 2nm node).

The new FPA-1200NZ2C device is also equipped with innovative environmental control technology designed to minimize fine particle contamination. Since it doesn't require a "special" light source like extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, Canon's NIL solution is notably energy-efficient and can significantly reduce power consumption, thereby contributing to CO2 reduction.

The FPA-1200NZ2C is capable of manufacturing complex semiconductor circuits with an increasing number of defect-free layers, thanks to the aforementioned fine particle control technology. Canon states that this machinery can be utilized for a wide range of applications, including metalenses for extended reality (XR) devices with microstructures in the tens of nanometers, as well as logic circuits in CPUs and various other semiconductor devices.

Nanoimprint lithography is a technique that has been in existence for over 20 years, as noted by Pranay Kotasthane, the chairperson of the Takshashila Institution, in an interview with CNBC. However, the technology failed to gain significant traction, primarily because extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines produced by the Dutch company ASML delivered superior results for highly sophisticated chip products.

Canon, which has been developing its NIL technology since 2004, is now banking on the idea that this "cheaper" solution is "good enough" for producing advanced microchips independently.

Permalink to story.

 
Would be interesting to know how pure the stamp surface here or etched surface in the ASML
Is it 1 part trillions ???
 
OMG with the CO2 obsession.
Yeah, putting your fingers in your ears, and go ''lalalalalala'', and just ignore the problem is also a fine solution, in the short term, just like peeing in your pants if it's cold.

Writing this from a computer on Troll B platform, 55km off the coast of Norway, but yeah the Mother F***ing oil companies knew over 30 years ago that climate change was a problem!
Climate of Concern - Royal Dutch Shell (1991)

Tho, Shell was not as bad as ESSO and ExxonMobil, they just kept their mouth shut, and buried the evidence they had, and sit on it, ESSO and ExxonMobil spend every year billions on a FUD campaigns, that global warming is just a hoax.

I am not a tree hugger (work in Oil & Gas), or against use of oil, I am, tho, against the pure waste of it, EV's for now are not the solution, starting to drive smaller (hybrid) sedans tho, would save a lot, same as building better houses.

Less power is cheaper. That’s why this is significant.
True, next to that, competition in the lithographics business is not bad, tho it's a bit bad for my ASML stock I own.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, putting your fingers in your ears, and go ''lalalalalala'', and just ignore the problem is also a fine solution, in the short term, just like peeing in your pants if it's cold.

Writing this from a computer on Troll B platform, 55km off the coast of Norway, but yeah the Mother F***ing oil companies knew over 30 years ago that climate change was a problem!
Climate of Concern - Royal Dutch Shell (1991)

Tho, Shell was not as bad as ESSO and ExxonMobil, they just kept their mouth shut, and buried the evidence they had, and sit on it, ESSO and ExxonMobil spend every year billions on a FUD campaigns, that global warming is just a hoax.

I am not a tree hugger (work in Oil & Gas), or against use of oil, I am, tho, against the pure waste of it, EV's for now are not the solution, starting to drive smaller (hybrid) sedans tho, would save a lot, same as building better houses.


True, next to that, competition in the lithographics business is not bad, tho it's a bit bad for my ASML stock I own.
Acting like any major problem, such as the environment, has 1 simple solution, e.g., less CO2, is automatically junk science for simple-minded people.

It would be like trying to improve global public health by only focusing on a single virus over everything else. Such a myopic view increased suicides, cancer deaths, etc as well as destroyed family businesses, hurt child development and more. Not to mention how poor people and developing countries were hurt the worst. AND we caused a global recession and historic inflation. Oh and didn’t even solve the tiny virus part of the larger problem.

So yeah, hyper-focus on a single thing as the only salvation to a complex global problem is demonstrably terrible policy.

(PS strawmen arguments don’t work against intelligent people)
 
I have no faith in the brand, they don't even make reliable printers. Better wait for Epson's solution.

Jokes aside, it would be good if some real competition appeared for ASML.

 
The more important Greenhouse Gas to reduce is Methane. Quit Eating Beans, Cow and Pig Farts. It is 10x more damaging/reflective to IR heat then CO2, which means less LPG/CNG/Propane and Natural Gas Consumption would be more beneficial. Of course, all those oil platforms that simply allow the Natural Gas to pour into the Atmosphere should be capped instead of allowed to burn it off.
 
Acting like any major problem, such as the environment, has 1 simple solution, e.g., less CO2, is automatically junk science for simple-minded people.
So you're saying 1+1 is not 2, and proven statistic coloration is meaningless?

Tho, yes, the release of mainly methane is also an extra factor, so you're right it's more 0.8+1=2, not completely right, but still close enough to see it as the main factor.

(PS strawmen arguments don’t work against intelligent people)
How is it a strawmen argument, if among specialist, about 99% of the scientific consensus agree on it?
And 97% of scientists in all fields agree on it.

NEnw4Zh1PBxppzIjVuWhl6em.gif


The strawmen arguments are made by oil companies, and say, that the world is going to hell is not our fault, look here at all the scientific paper's made with our money, that say global warming is a hoax.

Luckily for them, as most people are dumb, because it would never work on smart people. ^_^
 
The more important Greenhouse Gas to reduce is Methane. Quit Eating Beans, Cow and Pig Farts. It is 10x more damaging/reflective to IR heat then CO2, which means less LPG/CNG/Propane and Natural Gas Consumption would be more beneficial. Of course, all those oil platforms that simply allow the Natural Gas to pour into the Atmosphere should be capped instead of allowed to burn it off.
But Natural Gas is Green now, according to california! So letting it loose is a Good Thing (tm). At least until the next NPC update.
So you're saying 1+1 is not 2, and proven statistic coloration is meaningless?

Tho, yes, the release of mainly methane is also an extra factor, so you're right it's more 0.8+1=2, not completely right, but still close enough to see it as the main factor.


How is it a strawmen argument, if among specialist, about 99% of the scientific consensus agree on it?
And 97% of scientists in all fields agree on it.

NEnw4Zh1PBxppzIjVuWhl6em.gif
99% of doctors once claimed smoking was good for your health too. And that sugar was good for you.

but apparently the concept of bribes and corruption dont apply to "climate scientists" who cant get predictions right. And remember, these same fields advocate for shutting down nuclear power in favor of natural gas or RESTARTING COAL PLANTS because "muh chernobyl scawy uwu". But totally not gaslighting people, no sire.

The strawmen arguments are made by oil companies, and say, that the world is going to hell is not our fault, look here at all the scientific paper's made with our money, that say global warming is a hoax.

Luckily for them, as most people are dumb, because it would never work on smart people. ^_^
Remember how the world was going to freeze in the 80s? Then it became about how there would be no water left in the 90s? Then florida would be underwater by 2000 because of "global warming"? Then it was 2020? then it was "well its not global warming its actually "climate change" because temps dont always go up!". then we switched to "global boiling".

Who is making strawmans again? Because it sure looks like "climate scientists" are throwing every doomsday idea they've ever seen in sci fi at the wall hoping SOMETHING sticks.
 
Acting like any major problem, such as the environment, has 1 simple solution, e.g., less CO2, is automatically junk science for simple-minded people.

It would be like trying to improve global public health by only focusing on a single virus over everything else. Such a myopic view increased suicides, cancer deaths, etc as well as destroyed family businesses, hurt child development and more. Not to mention how poor people and developing countries were hurt the worst. AND we caused a global recession and historic inflation. Oh and didn’t even solve the tiny virus part of the larger problem.

So yeah, hyper-focus on a single thing as the only salvation to a complex global problem is demonstrably terrible policy.

(PS strawmen arguments don’t work against intelligent people)

You prefeer 2.5 million children, women, men dies for your wallet .. got it.
 
So you're saying 1+1 is not 2, and proven statistic coloration is meaningless?

Tho, yes, the release of mainly methane is also an extra factor, so you're right it's more 0.8+1=2, not completely right, but still close enough to see it as the main factor.


How is it a strawmen argument, if among specialist, about 99% of the scientific consensus agree on it?
And 97% of scientists in all fields agree on it.

NEnw4Zh1PBxppzIjVuWhl6em.gif


The strawmen arguments are made by oil companies, and say, that the world is going to hell is not our fault, look here at all the scientific paper's made with our money, that say global warming is a hoax.

Luckily for them, as most people are dumb, because it would never work on smart people. ^_^

Misspelling aside, you need to learn the difference between *correlation and causation*. I can't have a meaningful debate with someone that doesn't understand the basics.

I'm afraid you might be shocked to learn that correlations can often be coincidental or even spurious, but who knows, everyone's learning journey is different.

(Relatedly, your use of strawman arguments demonstrates that you don't understand that either.)

 
ALWAYS follow the money.
ROTFLOL, you don't know how insane that sounds, in that context, don't you?

I am pretty much familiar with the concept of "Never work your self out of a good job", same go's for profit margins.

Bayer-Monsanto, Dupont, ESSO, Mobil, what do these companies all have in common, insane profits, they do, and have done, literal anything, to keep the good times going.

Worked my whole life as a pipe fitter in the Oil and Gas, starting as a pipe fitter in The Nederlands, and work my self up to supervisor now the last 15y on Troll B Statoil platform in Norway.

I know one thing for sure, they don't give a **** about people, only money, and they will lie, cheat and bribe to get more of it!

And, I still work for them, because I also still like the money they pay me, but I know I work for a bunch of *******s that don't give a **** about climate change, so I am taking the money and run.
And made sure that I live somewhere where climate change have little to no impact, and me, my wife, kids and grandkids will be just fine.
 
Back