China still has the two fastest supercomputers in the world, but the US is catching up

midian182

Posts: 9,744   +121
Staff member

It’s that time of year again when the bi-annual TOP500 list of the fastest supercomputers in the world is released. The 48th edition shows that while Chinese machines are hanging on to the number one and two positions, the US now has the same number of computers in the top 500 as its Asian rival.

Back in June, Sunway TaihuLight’s Linpack benchmark of 93 petaflops knocked Tianhe-2 – clocked at 34 petaflops - off the number one spot. The highest US supercomputer on the list, the 17.59 petaflop Titan, was in third place. Six months later, the top three entries remain the same.

June’s list also marked the first time that China had more supercomputers in the top 500 than the US – 167 compared to America’s 165. But the two countries are now back on equal terms, boasting 171 entries each.

In terms of aggregate Linpack performance, the US holds 33.9 percent of the total, slightly ahead of China’s 33.3 percent. Adding together the performance of all the supercomputers on the list equals 672 petaflops, an increase of 60 percent compared to the same period last year.

Germany sits behind China and the US with the third largest number of supercomputers in the top 500. It’s followed by Japan, France, and the UK.

Two new computers make it into November’s top ten: the 14 petaflop Cori arrives at number five, which is a Cray XC40 system from Berkeley Lab’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC); while Japan’s Oakforest-PACS – rated at 13.6 petaflops – comes in at number six. Both machines run Intel Knights Landing Xeon Phi 7250 68-core processors.

One interesting statistic from the list is that 498 of the 500 computers are now running Linux. Only two Chinese machines – at 386 and 387 – run IBM AIX, a variant of Unix. Linux completely overtook Unix as the supercomputer OS of choice in 2004, just six years after it first appeared on the list, and has been ahead ever since.

Permalink to story.

 
Funny, I was going to say the same thing about playing DOOM .....

Actually, knowing computer engineers, I would be more surprised if at least a few of these machines haven't had Doom run on them at one point or another (obviously when the boss wasn't looking)


But wouldn't these things still need a powerful GPU to render 3D graphics?

I think supercomputers are only good for calculations - not rendering.

Hook it to a Titan X 12GB and run a game in maximum possible settings.
 
But wouldn't these things still need a powerful GPU to render 3D graphics?

I think supercomputers are only good for calculations - not rendering.

Hook it to a Titan X 12GB and run a game in maximum possible settings.
It's also Doom, and bored computer engineers. Hell, I know one that keeps it on the following ("just in case"):
  • USB
  • DVD/CD
  • Zip
  • Magnetic Tape
  • 3.5", 5.25", and 8" floppy
The only reason he probably doesn't have it on punch cards or punch tape is because it would just take up too much space in his house.
 
It's pretty nice the Oak Ridge one how with a 1/6 of the cores it can do 1/2 the load of the 2nd fastest Chinese one. Looks like one of the most efficient in numbers.
 
It's also Doom, and bored computer engineers. Hell, I know one that keeps it on the following ("just in case"):
  • USB
  • DVD/CD
  • Zip
  • Magnetic Tape
  • 3.5", 5.25", and 8" floppy
The only reason he probably doesn't have it on punch cards or punch tape is because it would just take up too much space in his house.


That's a good point, but there are a few super computers (depending on how you define that) such as the CRAY that has extremely good graphic's capabilities. The CIA and the Pentagon have rooms full of them used for many different real time capabilities that are graphically oriented. Although I doubt they have had the opportunity to run DOOM, at least not the game by that name ....... LOL
 
I'm just surprised they went for Opterons in the Cray Supercomputer. I know Opterons have their strengths (Price for one) but who knows. I'm sure they weighed the pros and cons beforehand. Still, it makes you wonder how much more powerful it could be with Intel Chips.
 
Back