"Crypto is dead in America," says tech billionaire who predicted Bitcoin would hit $200,000

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
A hot potato: Investor Chamath Palihapitiya, the billionaire who once said BTC would reach $200,000, has claimed that crypto is dead in America. He mostly blames regulators for digital assets' demise, especially the SEC, who he says have "pointed their guns at crypto."

Speaking on the latest episode of the All-In podcast, which he co-hosts, Palihapitiya pointed the finger of blame for crypto's alleged demise in America at those who regulate the industry.

"The United States authorities have firmly pointed their guns at crypto," said Palihapitiya.

The statement was a response to news that Coinbase, the second-largest crypto exchange in the world by trading volume, is considering moving outside of the US; it was granted a company license to operate in Bermuda last week.

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, told CNBC that it is preparing for a years-long court battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission after the regulator issued it with a Wells notice last month, which is usually the final step before charges are formally issued. Coinbase sued the SEC on Monday because, as Armstrong put it, the company believes the SEC is breaking the law.

"Crypto is dead in America. I mean now you have Gensler [chair of the US Securities Exchange Commission] even blaming the banking crisis on crypto – so the United States authorities have firmly pointed their guns at crypto." As noted by Fortune, Gensler highlighted failed crypto-friendly banks Silvergate Bank and the Signature Bank of New York in his congressional remarks on the banking crisis.

Another exchange, Bittrex, has already said that it has started the process of winding down its US operations as it is not economically viable for it to continue operating in the current US regulatory and economic environment.

Palihapitiya said crypto companies "were probably the ones that were the most threatening to the establishment," but he did admit that the industry pushed "the boundaries more than any other sector of the startup economy."

Palihapitiya's words starkly contrast his once bullish views on crypto. In 2021, he predicted that Bitcoin would rise from its then $39,000 price to $100,000 before eventually climbing to $200,000. He later said that Bitcoin had "effectively replaced gold."

Bitcoin is nowhere near its all-time high of $68,789, but it is up around 65% since the start of the year, from $16,675 to the current price of $27,414. Earlier this month, BTC hovered above the $30,000 mark for the first time since last June.

Permalink to story.

 
One of the best thing I appreciate about a great news is if it has an smart-inspiring title.
And this title - "Crypto is dead in America," says tech billionaire who predicted Bitcoin would hit $200,000 - is one of them
Dude, you made me laugh and also capture the essence of this news right from the title.
 
Bascicaly this is just a cry for help by the tech billionary to get u to buy stocks for him so he doesnt get proven wrong lol
 
Yes, crypto is dead in America because of the SEC, but of course! It has nothing to do with the fact that it's a zero sum Ponzi-scheme and millions already got burned and lost their money. No, it's always the government's fault with their pesky regulations. Silly billionaires always looking to get a little richer and when they can't they always blame the government.

I don't know how many times I have to point this out, but for YOU to make money on crypto someone else has to lose money. Crypto has no intrinsic value and is backed by nothing except by people's gullibility and greed to make a quick buck. It is literally a mathematical impossibility for everyone to make money on crypto.

You make money by buying crypto when it's cheap and then wait for bigger suckers to pay more for it than you did, then you cash out. Rinse and repeat. The only problem is that eventually we will reach the sucker saturation point where no one else is willing to risk their money and then the bubble pops and someone ends up holding the bag of feces that is crypto. Just pray it isn't you.
 
I expect he is saying that to cause some market instability so he can buy some more on the cheap.
Crypto is so volatile that a few already very wealthy people are making huge sums more money at everybody else's expense with just a word here or there.
 
The US id1otic policy of limitlessly printing money have benefited scams like crypto and now they're losing control. This guy is whining for nothing, the US is still the main crypto powerhouse and without its support, it would value close to nothing. It would take a brave administration to effectively put an end to it and I don't see that in either political party.
 
For continuing updates on crypto-disasters, and occasional in-depth pieces, check out Molly White's expert blog "Web3 Is Going Just Great". Essential reading if you have the slightest interest in that world.
 
Has anyone noticed an uptick on fake crypto troll bot accounts on YouTube lately? I've seen instances of them holding 32 bot accounts and upvoting themselves and having a whole threaded conversations about the same thing all boasting how great it is and how much they make. Does anyone actually believe them?
It's so random too and way off topic.
I'm like great comment, great comment, then wtf ( 32 upvotes and responses from different bot accounts all talking about crypto currencies)
 
Its not dead, it's a gambling coin. You can bet on sports as well, or go the casino, pretty much the same thing.

Fortunately, GPU mining is pretty much dead. This is great for the planet, and for people in general. No more power waste or chip scarcity.
 
Last edited:
Translation: "Crypto is a shady enterprise that can't do well in regions with strong protections against financial crime."
Do you mean can't succeed where there is criminals running the money system and putting fake security in place to make you think your safe when actually its just so you cannot see them steal your money
Income tax is illegal ...prove me wrong with some facts
 
Back