Gamers and developers everywhere are celebrating Bobby Kotick's departure

Jimmy2x

Posts: 238   +29
Staff
The big picture: It's been a rough ride for Activision Blizzard over the last few years. Fans and employees have endured everything from death threats against workers to legal actions related to reported workplace misconduct. Microsoft's recent acquisition is a potential turning point in restoring the company's tarnished reputation.

On Friday, CEO Bobby Kotick's 33-year tenure at Activision officially ended. Kotick's much-anticipated retirement followed a formal announcement from Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer earlier this month.

Shortly after his departure, social media sparked to life with stories of Kotick's interference in the development cycles of popular Activision Blizzard titles. The claims align with previous criticisms of Modern Warfare III's shortened development time and use of recycled "nostalgic" content in place of typical development cycles.

Team members from other Activision titles also voiced their experiences while attempting to develop quality products under Kotick's watch. According to a post from Overwatch 2 team member Andy Belford, the CEO ignored warnings about the game's unready state and potential reception before the game's release. Appropriate measures during the development and release cycles could have positively impacted the game's otherwise cold reception.

Activision's partners and employees aren't the only ones celebrating Kotick's departure. Gamers worldwide have also expressed their relief following Kotick's retirement. One Chinese X user noted that gamers in his country hate Kotick and blame him for Blizzard taking its games offline in China. He claims that groups of people celebrated Kotick's resignation with fireworks in the streets.

The claims of interference and the blatant dislike of Kotick as a leader aren't the first blemishes on his less-than-stellar record. Following claims of a voicemail threatening to kill an assistant in 2006, Kotick was the subject of a flight attendant's sexual harassment lawsuit in 2007. He later found himself at the center of several alleged incidents involving rape and harassment stretching from the mid-2010s through 2021. Earlier this year, Kotick and Activision paid a $35 million settlement after failing to maintain adequate controls to report and address misconduct within the company.

Kotick leaves Activision with more than 30 years at the helm. Unfortunately, he unavoidably marred his legacy with poor decision-making. Major titles such as World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, Overwatch, and Diablo have all made their mark on the gaming world under his watch, but his name likely won't be positively attributed to any of them.

Permalink to story.

 
That's only half of the battle. Am I the only one that thinks that Microsoft won't be any better? Windows is more interested in marketing AI than improving/fixing windows. Every game will get AI added on if it fits or not. Worry about bugs later.
 
They are expected to drop one game per year. It does not matter who leads them, it is not enough
with how complex aaa games are today.
 
You know, its going to be HILARIOUS in 3-5 years, when MS thoroughly screws with Activision they way they did with 343 and are in the process of with bethesda, when their products get SO bad, that people will be looking back at Kotick and wishing he was back in charge.

It's happened with every property MS has touched. It happened with EA and Ubisoft. It'll happen here.
It's amazing to have seen the long slide into villainy EA, Activision, and Ubisoft took over the past 15 years... quite astounding really.
A group of big box CEOs, thoroughly tired of ruining retail stores, figured to that gamers are socially inept enough but wealthy enough to be milked for decades with slop, and got to milking. The consumer is entirely to blame for the industry getting to the point it has. The only reason such poor practices have stuck around has been because it works, and consoomers will dump hundreds of millions of dollars into black holes if they have the right IP on them.
Bobby don’t care. Bobby made bank. The prick doesn’t deserve a cent and should be in tail.
For what, exactly? The allegations? The ones that were settled out of court and join the suspiciously large number of statistics that tell an inconvenient truth? The garbage with Blizzard? That was terrible, yes, but blizzard's C suite seems to be perfectly willing to eat their own customers. They didnt need Kotick for that.
 
Bah don't cry for poor Bobby. He made bank for decades and as a CEO, he comes equipped with standard issue Golden Parachute so he will be appointed CEO somewhere else in no time.

However, is worth nothing that whoever takes his place could be even more evil and perverse.
 
Oh wait, rape, sexual harassment, death threats, fostering a toxic culture, gee they sound like the traits straight from Trump's playbook, but the same people celebrating Kotics's departure would easily vote for Trump and not in the least bit be worried by their hypocrisy.
 
Oh wait, rape, sexual harassment, death threats, fostering a toxic culture, gee they sound like the traits straight from Trump's playbook, but the same people celebrating Kotics's departure would easily vote for Trump and not in the least bit be worried by their hypocrisy.
Why the unsolicited political toxicity? Leave politics on more appropriate topics, and drop the toxicity all together.
 
Eh, in terms of business he was fantastic for Activision and now the woke lot will probably take over and sink it. Good.

Sure, they milked gamers, but COD fans got COD and WoW fans got WoW. 'Casual' gamers got all the candies they could afford (or not). The only really egregious stuff was the 'don't you have phones?' and Lulu's Twitter tantrums, but that wasn't Koptik's fault.

As for the man himself... I don't really care.
 
It's amazing to have seen the long slide into villainy EA, Activision, and Ubisoft took over the past 15 years... quite astounding really.

But that's by design: By law Corporations need to put the shareholders first, and its when you understand that you understand all the short-term focused moves that corporations make, often to their own long-term detriment.
 
Back