Going to build a new PC is it ok or shall I add or replace something?

Ok, I just finished building your Workstation build on Newegg, just send me your email in a PM. Just note that I have only 1 HDD, you can add as many as you would need, but remember that they must fit in the case. Also, I added in a noctua CPU cooler since you dont need to water-cool a workstation. The total of the Workstation build is about $4000. I will work on the gaming one later.
 
Actualy I waant to be upto date with with tech I always like latest product
I have almost every release of gtx series after gtx 460 expect than gtx titan
I luv to buy latest thing

I have posted a new thread in networking please have a look and suggest
 
Hi, I'd suggest a 27" 2560x1440 IPS with 120Hz refresh rate.
I'm using a 24" 1920x1200 and I think the pixel density noticeably poor. I imagine it would be worse on 27".
 
  • Like
Reactions: hexDb
What about overall configuration for a gaming pc what will you recommend to replace or add no budget bar
 
I know that's why I was concerned about the pixel density.
If I were you, I would look for an IPS 2560x1440 27" display with 120 hz. I think you'll have a rough time finding one at guaranteed 144 Hz but you'd probably be able to overdrive it up.
 
hellokitty[hk] said:
I know that's why I was concerned about the pixel density.
If I were you, I would look for an IPS 2560x1440 27" display with 120 hz. I think you'll have a rough time finding one at guaranteed 144 Hz but you'd probably be able to overdrive it up.
Click to expand...
Wouldnt he need a Titan for 144Hz? Also dont IPS have slow response times?
 
It's true that inherently IPS is slower than TN but the majority of input lag comes from input scalars within the monitor and internal buffering.

For example something like a 27" 2560x1440 Korean IPS with no input aside from a single DVI port will have nearly zero input lag, in the range of a few ms. Other IPS like Dell Ultrasharp U2410 also will have about 10ms or an HP ZR2740W which also has about 10ms, which is decent for an IPS or TN.
In fact the lowest input lag of any monitor AFAIK is the Dell Ultrasharp U2312HM which is an IPS with an input lag of reportedly down to .6ms!
Eizo Foris FS2332 is also an IPS with ~1ms input lag.

There are Korean 27" 2560x1440 IPS with overdrive and 120hz + capailities but they're often sold out and tough to find, but they'd be my ideal monitor.

BTW I am not talking about the commonly specified GTG response time, that's how long it would take for the pixels to flip from grey back to grey. I'm talking about the total time it takes from receiving an input signal to changing the pixels.

I have no idea how much graphics power he'd need but I'm sure it's hefty.
 
hellokitty[hk] said:
It's true that inherently IPS is slower than TN but the majority of input lag comes from input scalars within the monitor and internal buffering.

For example something like a 27" 2560x1440 Korean IPS with no input aside from a single DVI port will have nearly zero input lag, in the range of a few ms. Other IPS like Dell Ultrasharp U2410 also will have about 10ms or an HP ZR2740W which also has about 10ms, which is decent for an IPS or TN.
In fact the lowest input lag of any monitor AFAIK is the Dell Ultrasharp U2312HM which is an IPS with an input lag of reportedly down to .6ms!
Eizo Foris FS2332 is also an IPS with ~1ms input lag.

There are Korean 27" 2560x1440 IPS with overdrive and 120hz + capailities but they're often sold out and tough to find, but they'd be my ideal monitor.

BTW I am not talking about the commonly specified GTG response time, that's how long it would take for the pixels to flip from grey back to grey. I'm talking about the total time it takes from receiving an input signal to changing the pixels.

I have no idea how much graphics power he'd need but I'm sure it's hefty.
Click to expand...
Interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back