Google bans Chrome extensions that don't originate from the Web Store

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,310   +193
Staff member

google chrome web store

In an effort to cut down on the number of Chrome malware installations, Google is now only allowing browser extensions to be installed directly from the Chrome Web Store. It’s a move the company says will help keep its users safe as they browse the web.

The change will also affect extensions that were previously installed. Google tells us that some may be automatically disabled and cannot be re-enabled or re-installed until they’re hosted in the Chrome Web Store.

Google will, however, continue to support local extension installs during development as well as installs via Enterprise policy for the developer community. Those with a dedicated installation flow from their website can also make use of the existing inline installs feature. As such, Windows developer channel users are unaffected by these changes.

It’s worth pointing out that these changes only apply to Windows users and only to those using the stable or beta builds of Chrome. It has no impact on Chrome for Mac, Linux or Chrome OS.

If you do notice that some of your favorite extensions are now shut down, there really isn’t much you can do about it (short of changing browsers or operating systems) except hope that the developer gets them approved by Google and added to the Chrome Web Store.

Google already employs a number of features to keep the bad guys out. For example, Safe Browsing alerts users if they’ve stumbled upon a potentially dangerous site or download while a reset button has been implemented in the event your settings get hijacked.

Permalink to story.

 
I feel like Google should give people the option to enable this for better security, but leave the option open for the more experienced users.
 
I feel this is just the first step to silently ban all ad-blockers soon
which will make me go to firefox immediatly
 
Huh? Why are you not using firefox already when it is obvious chrome was only created with the sole purpose of spying on its users browsing habits with a view to making money from it.
 
Huh? Why are you not using firefox already when it is obvious chrome was only created with the sole purpose of spying on its users browsing habits with a view to making money from it.

I still use firefox as the lack of RSS feed support on chrome lessens it's usefulness for me
 
Hm. Looks like Google also supports a walled garden in some of their products.
 
One thing about Chrome is that the adobe flash player updates are not current with ie and firefox, so they are still the hijacked ones.
 
One thing about Chrome is that the adobe flash player updates are not current with ie and firefox, so they are still the hijacked ones.
I dunno so much, I've noticed every time Adobe update their flash player an updated Google browser quickly follows.
 
Huh? Why are you not using firefox already when it is obvious chrome was only created with the sole purpose of spying on its users browsing habits with a view to making money from it.

I still use firefox as the lack of RSS feed support on chrome lessens it's usefulness for me
I've found the exact opposite, I can't find a decent RSS feed support for Firefox (well one that I like). RSS Feed Reader is perfect for me and it comes from the Chrome Store.
 
Back