last one, honest
yea i think i'm with most people on this one... Norton and Mcafee both tend to overload the system. Also currently using AVG ..
If I will choose between mcafee and norton, I will choose McAfee. It's portable scanner is cool and effective (scan.exe). And it will not eat much of your computer resources unlike NORTON. If you want some free anti virus. I will recommend AVG. It's effective and FREE
i've been using BitDefender for the past 6 months or so, for home use and for protecting our laptops at work.
Its really good imho. 2008 antivirus with anti-spam and anti-malware cost £45 for 10 licences.
I decided to use it after asking folk then looking for benchests. Bit Defender came very near the top in all of em, nailing nortons and macaphee easily, and mostly outgunning avast and avg. Its only real contender seemed to be kaspersky. Go look for yourself.
i don't now umm tape a duck to your computer and it well fend of the viruses.
That would be as effective as putting Norton on it.
i had norton for a year, first 4 mos of it, was a nightmare, it didnt protect, my p.c., mcafee going on 1 year, no problems at all. i will always reccomend mcafee!!!!!
i do like the tape a duck to your pc idea why not, eh
true, it would be better than norton as well
yep ducks are a great way to keep your pc safe!!!
LOL: AVG is better solution
neither, use spybot search and destroy
If you are saying to use just Spybot over Norton or McAffee, then that isn't a great idea. Well i wouldn't do it anyway Spybot is just for spyware and trojans etc and not for viruses so you will want an anti virus program such as AVG as well