TechSpot

Nvidia demonstrates prototype VR display operating at 1,700Hz... but there's a catch

By Shawn Knight
Apr 7, 2016
Post New Reply
  1. One of the key hurdles that desktop-class virtual reality companies like Oculus VR and HTC must overcome is latency, or the amount of time it takes for the platform to register the fact that you’ve moved your head to the moment the display responds to the movement.

    If it’s too low, you’ll likely run into motion sickness.

    As Road to VR notes, current high-end headsets feature displays running at 90Hz which means they can display 90 images per second. That’s the generally accepted standard today but according to Nvidia’s Vice President of Research, David Luebke, there’s plenty of room for improvement.

    During Nvidia’s recent GPU Technology Conference, Luebke demonstrated a prototype display operating at an impressive 1,700Hz which is nearly 20 times faster than what today’s consumer headsets are doing. The prototype was attached to a rail system that rapidly moved back and forth yet due to the high refresh rate, the resulting image was barely affected.

    Luebke said they overloaded the display and was driving it with a novel binary delta sigma encoder approach. The executive joked that you could put the display in a paint shaker and it would appear to stay solid, effectively eliminating the display as the latency bottleneck.

    With a fast display like this, the bottleneck simply moves elsewhere so you’d need an extremely low latency input to accommodate it. Luebke told the publication that the wheels on the rail system used in the demo fed the movement of the carriage almost instantaneously to the system. Without a low latency input mechanism, the fast refresh rate of the display is essentially useless.

    Until we reach a point where latency is lowered across the board, clever tricks like low persistence will have to suffice.

    Permalink to story.

     
  2. VitalyT

    VitalyT Russ-Puss Posts: 3,149   +1,424

    I believe that VR team tried to push 90Hz because they couldn't achieve higher numbers. Sometime down the road they will achieve 120Hz, and will say - that's what you need to completely eliminate motion sickness, which would be closer to the truth.

    The eventual goal is to be unable to tell it from the reality, which is roughly 8K per eye, at 120Hz. Probably will take another 5 years for VR-s to get there.

    I'm not sure what nVidia is up to with their 1700Hz technology though...

    ...trying to catch Dash perhaps? - :)
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2016
    wastedkill likes this.
  3. m4a4

    m4a4 TS Guru Posts: 751   +270

    All I came here to say is that I appreciate the use of the thumbnail used on this article
     
  4. Sniped_Ash

    Sniped_Ash TS Maniac Posts: 253   +108

    John Carmack has been harping for years on how reducing latency is the most important thing for VR. Nvidia's demonstration was more about that than the insane refresh rate.

    same
     

Similar Topics

Add New Comment

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...