ramonsterns said:
*Applies blue paint on face*
A-hem...
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
LOOOLZ!!!!!!!
ramonsterns said:
*Applies blue paint on face*
A-hem...
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
slamscaper said:
I don't know how these lawyers sleep at night. These guys (along with RIAA, MPAA, etc..) are just plain evil. More than half of these cases will hold the parents responsible just because their kid happened to download a pirated movie they knew nothing about.
A lot of these folks are struggling to make ends meet financially, so that last thing they need is some money hungry corporate entity making an example of them.
I don't care what anyone says. This is plain wrong. Piracy is indeed a problem, but this is no way to remedy it.
I don't know how these lawyers sleep at night. These guys (along with RIAA, MPAA, etc..) are just plain evil. More than half of these cases will hold the parents responsible just because their kid happened to download a pirated movie they knew nothing about.
A lot of these folks are struggling to make ends meet financially, so that last thing they need is some money hungry corporate entity making an example of them.
I don't care what anyone says. This is plain wrong. Piracy is indeed a problem, but this is no way to remedy it.Couldn't agree with you more. But, I have an idea to stop piracy! Make an affordable subscription service online that has all the offerings of a normal cable company that charges you out the @$$. Too bad corporations won't make exorbitant amounts of money that way. Their lobbyists influence the law to crush the competition and make us pay what they want to charge. There is no supply and demand anymore, now it's "We have the supply and demand you pay this price."
Why can't anonymous just shut down all these web sits? You'd think with all their skill they'd be able to update the bios on the server's boards and the fry the CPU's. But I guess they don't want to cause real damage, just to make a show of things and grab the public's attention for a day or two.
captaincranky said:
Or, you could just shut up, and go to Redbox and rent it for a dollar.
I'm plenty happy with my netflix subscription, I'm not a big movie person anyway. Never looked into redbox so I can't comment on what they have available. I'm interested in TV shows, like The Wire, and don't know if redbox offers the same things I'm interested in. I just hate paying a $200 cable bill when I almost never use the TV, I'm sure there are plenty of people who can sympathize with that. Although, cranky, your comment wasn't as witty as I normally expect of you.
Well then you should move to a country that has Redbox. That would be the best thing for all concerned. You'd be off watching the movie, and the rest us of would be spared your "guest trolling". "Herpa derpa", is that some sort of disease you people in the third world contract? Cuz if it is, I have no intention of contributing a dime to its relief fund, nor will I vote for a politician that claims he or she will.Yes because RedBox is in every country...
Herpa Derpa!
I?ve been waiting for someone like you to chime in, Slam and yRaz. It doesn?t take long for the liberals to jump on this and cry ?Corporate Greed!? and blame THEM for prosecuting poor people. Protection of digital materials and intellectual property is a sign of a civilized 1st world country. Next you?ll be telling us how we should all be able to ?free? to produce iPhones and how the evil lawyers should stop lining their pockets by prosecuting us.
They don?t ?make you pay what they want to charge? yRaz, you?re free watch something else.
Of course there?s another option, taught to use by Chris Rock in his piece titled ?How to avoid getting your *** kicked by the police.? Step 1) OBEY THE LAW!!
yRaz said:
matrix86 said:
This wouldn't happen if you were running proxies and peer-guardian
But the smartest thing to do in this case is to ask for proof that you were the one who did the downloading and not someone else piggy-backing off of you. Either the lawyers will ask the court to shell out money for warrants of hard drive seizures or they'll all just say "you know what? Don't worry about it. They're right. We have no proof it was them." Just think about how much money and time would be spent on getting warrants approved and then going through all the info on all those hard drives. It just isn't worth it. Unfortunately, if you caught downloading, you most likely aren't smart enough to think of this, lol.
Of course they can always subpoena your harddrives, look what they did with geohotz. It really isn't that hard or expensive to do. It isn't even that hard to search for files on a harddrive. With the Windows search function and a few minutes I can find your music and movies. People don't hide pirated stuff like they hide their porn, very easy to find.
Well, if you listen to the people that did, they'll tell you, "It wasn't worth paying for, so I stole it"! Is something is bad, then you should just avoid it. That makes sense to me.Who would download the expendables anyway? The Copyright group should be paying the pirates for wanting to watch this so called movie.
So basically what you're trying to say is, they just pull these names out of a hat and summarily prosecute them?Second, the problem here isn't justification of piracy, but instead the methods of prosecution. It's been proven time and again that these law firms are extorting people for crimes they're innocent of committing. Using flawed methods of identifying defendants and then threatening innocent people with lawsuits of hundreds of thousands of dollars or settling for $3000 or similar amounts. All the while knowing full well that contracting a lawyer will likely cost more than the settlement offer forces many to simply give into the bullying and pay up.
But for people like you and TomSEA, I suppose the reality of this behavior won't hit home until you've been threatened and extorted yourselves.
captaincranky said:
Well, the thread is about the movie, "The Expendables", not the price of cable. So whether my comment was as witty as they normally are, is a moot point.
People are being targeted for illegally downloading "The Expendables", not for being unhappy with the price of cable."The Expendables" certainly was available at Redbox. It's not a TV show. So for all the crap and BS entitlement whining about free movies being a "God given right", limp d*** internet trolls with paranoid delusions of being "Braveheart", and the rest of the incessant garbage about how tough things are in the torrent world, I can state categorically I simply don't care.
Did you think you could watch 200 channels of TV when you signed the cable contract? Or were you just overwhelmed and impressed when the salesman told you you could have them?
Worse than that, as hats aren't very technically confusing to Judges nor are they as intimidating to defendants in settlement offers.So basically what you're trying to say is, they just pull these names out of a hat and summarily prosecute them?
ramonsterns said:
*Applies blue paint on face*
A-hem...
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM