Researchers discover 10% of Chrome extensions could be malicious

Scorpus

Posts: 2,162   +239
Staff member

Researchers examining the security of web browsers have uncovered that nearly 10% of extensions for Google Chrome could be used for data theft. Even more concerning, the behavior of malicious extensions is undetectable to end users, and the permission system doesn't always make it clear what an add-on will do to your browser.

Of the 48,000 Chrome extensions the researchers tested, 130 were labeled as being outright and definitively malicious. These extensions were found to perform a variety of dodgy actions, including credential and data theft, advertising and affiliate fraud, and abuse of a user's social networks.

A further 4,712 extensions were described as suspicious. One of these suspicious extensions was downloaded by more than 5.5 million people, and installs a tracking beacon that sends information on your browsing activity to a remote server, without encryption. This behavior wasn't labeled as malicious by the research team, but with unknown intentions it could be risky to use.

Some other suspicious extensions were found to modify the URLs of some shopping websites, such as Amazon, to insert an affiliate link. This behavior could earn money for the extension's creator, but commits affiliate fraud along the way. Other extensions replaced or injected ads into websites, again so the extension's creator could earn money.

To discover the dodgy extensions, the researchers developed a detection engine called Hulk, that closely monitors how extensions react with specific "HoneyPages" created by the team. Luckily, very few extensions were found to interfere with online banking.

Despite finding that nearly 10% of the extensions tested were dodgy, Google has been improving they way they deal with them. It's now harder to install extensions from outside of Google's Chrome Web Store, and all extensions on the store are reviewed. Despite this, some malicious extensions do slip through the cracks, so it's good to always be aware of what you're installing and exactly what it does.

Permalink to story.

 
The real question is what is Google going to do to help it's users? Certainly they can develop a realistic app that the end user can use to sniff these out and defeat them. Is that too much to expect considering the massive revenue to receive ....
 
I've always thought the whole damned browser was dodgy to begin with.

I guess Google doesn't like the, "targeted ads of others", to interfere with the, "abundant targeted ads of Google itself". At some point, somebody has to leave room for the actual content of the page. Er, don't they?:confused:

Alright boys and girls, can you say, "googleanalytics.exe?
 
Google prides itself in its "secure" browser, spending tens of thousands of dollars on defeating exploits but neglects the most obvious attack vector: extensions!
 
Had tons of experience downloading most of the video downloading extensions... so ye....
I knew the "iLivid" played AC/DCs "Highway to Malware", but I thought, "Video Download Helper" was OK. Although it does seem to leak memory and tends to crash Firefox's, "plug in Container", quite often..:D

As soon as I load a Google image page, it's not long afterward there comes the crash. The machine is 32 bit Win 7 & Intel G41, so there's no separate Vram.
 
Never did like chrome. Upon terminating, it flashes brightly and can give you a lapse, depending on how much pollution you're breathing today.
 
Reply, have A free one from Win Store-Purple YOUTUBE DOWNLOADER , just seeing'OOPS', usually the word after YouTube Download Failed(403 ERROR)
I'm not exactly sure what your meaning is here Graham...:confused:

I have, "Download Helper 4.9..something installed on this computer.
This extension works just dandy.

I was just sort of inquiring if @wastedkill thought this particular video download tool, was one of the 85% he considers, "malicious".
 
Back