Russian space agency confirms its LUNA-25 mission crashed on the lunar surface

Jimmy2x

Posts: 239   +29
Staff
What just happened? The lunar south pole has become the latest prize in the space race between several competing countries. Earlier this month, Russia launched its first lunar lander in 47 years to explore the moon's polar region. However, the mission was met with complications while preparing for its scheduled landing on the lunar surface.

Russia's Roscosmos space agency launched its Luna-Glob lander, later renamed LUNA-25, from the Vostochny Cosmodrome on August 10 aboard a Soyuz 2.1b rocket. The mission was scheduled to touch down on Sunday following its 10-day trip to the Moon's south pole.

However, on Saturday, Roscosmos officials stated that the lander experienced unspecified issues when attempting to begin its pre-landing orbit. In a Telegram message, officials said that an abnormal situation occurred during the operation, resulting in the craft's inability to perform planned maneuvers within the specified mission parameters resulting in a crash.

"...the apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon," said Roscosmos.

The crash marks an unfortunate failure for Russian lunar exploration and gives India's Chandrayaan-3 a chance to reach the pole first. Chandrayaan-3 is the successor to India's previous landing attempt, Chandrayaan-2, which also crashed into the lunar surface after a software glitch caused the craft to deviate from its trajectory and smash into the lunar surface in 2019.

Russia and India are not the only countries targeting the Moon's south pole. The United States and China are also racing to land crewed missions in the same region, hoping to establish a foothold and leverage the area's suspected natural resources. Scientists believe the location contains abundant frozen water, providing astronauts with a critical survival component and ingredient used in producing rocket fuel for future missions to Mars and beyond.

Resource gathering and positioning are the primary drivers in the race to the lunar south pole. However, there are also concerns that China might attempt to claim the territory should it be the first to establish a foothold in the region. If it does, other nations could potentially lose any ability to develop a human presence or access the critical resources needed for further space exploration.

The loss of the LUNA-25 lander may not be the nail in the coffin for Russia's space program, but it is a significant setback. Roscosmos hoped the mission would prove the country is still a viable player in the space race despite the sanctions levied against the country and the overall cost of the war in Ukraine. Instead, it puts Russia in an even more delicate situation that could impact future lunar missions and its downstream access to the moon's natural resources.

Permalink to story.

 
Russia really hasn't had any real success in space, for the most part, since the break up of the USSR.
Their boosters aren't bad, but their capsules and what not are still "technology" from the USSR era.
 
I heard people who worked at Roscosmos who stated that most of the hardware of Luna25 was the old USSR tech. Add it to utter destruction of schooling and professional environment, and you get an outdated device programmed by people who could not give a s**t about it since they are paid 50 times less than someone doing this job in a developed country.
 
I heard people who worked at Roscosmos who stated that most of the hardware of Luna25 was the old USSR tech. Add it to utter destruction of schooling and professional environment, and you get an outdated device programmed by people who could not give a s**t about it since they are paid 50 times less than someone doing this job in a developed country.

Some of that may be true - but I can not believe the programmers did not care - When you see a lander on the moon - you can claim x years later I programmed the stability software or whatever

Amatuer rocketeers - spend huge hours doing it for love
Life is about ,memories - Yeah you could get a bit of slackening off - as the make more money at night -selling their skills to private causes , developing apps , tutoring, darkware whatever
 
I heard people who worked at Roscosmos who stated that most of the hardware of Luna25 was the old USSR tech. Add it to utter destruction of schooling and professional environment, and you get an outdated device programmed by people who could not give a s**t about it since they are paid 50 times less than someone doing this job in a developed country.

You can't send in consumer hardware into space. There's radiation and all that to take into account. Older super slow CPU's which are shielded is often what you'll find. Limited, but it does the job.

Problem is often communication and real time data. What happened with the thing nobody knew, and it chrashed before it even could catch up.
 
You can't send in consumer hardware into space. There's radiation and all that to take into account. Older super slow CPU's which are shielded is often what you'll find. Limited, but it does the job.

Problem is often communication and real time data. What happened with the thing nobody knew, and it chrashed before it even could catch up.

The problem is the Russian's state governor: he finds far more attractive to spend resources in war and conflicts, than with peace and technology.
 
marx-lennon.jpg


Is anybody here, (besides me), old enough to get this joke?
 
Last edited:
Personally, I would not want to be one of those who worked on this mission. Putie will probably make them all disappear since they made "the motherland" look bad - not that it is taking much effort to do that these days.

IMO, Russia is demonstrating that they are all talk with nothing to back it up.
 
Personally, I would not want to be one of those who worked on this mission. Putie will probably make them all disappear since they made "the motherland" look bad - not that it is taking much effort to do that these days.

IMO, Russia is demonstrating that they are all talk with nothing to back it up.
The guy ultimately responsible has suddenly been taken to hospital!!
 
Russia really hasn't had any real success in space, for the most part, since the break up of the USSR.
Their boosters aren't bad, but their capsules and what not are still "technology" from the USSR era.

Really? You might want to check NASA and ask where they procure most of their rocket propulsion nowadays. At least, outside SpaceX (which is relatively very recent).

And while in topic, I don't remember SpaceX was succesful in its 1st, 2nd, 3rd or more launches. Nor did Apollo. Do I have to also mention tragic ones?
 
Russia really hasn't had any real success in space, for the most part, since the break up of the USSR.
Their boosters aren't bad, but their capsules and what not are still "technology" from the USSR era.

Further verified by their military complex. They claim to create cutting edge aircraft, but they soon drop out because they cannot be maintained. Their "future" tanks are getting blown up by simple drones, etc. In fact the only thing they do produce that is a superior quality are their small arms like the AK-47, AK-74, etc. ... neither of which will provide a safe moon landing .....
 
Back