Science isn't as disruptive as it used to be. Now we need to understand why

[Tams80]

Yeah, because who needs ethics anyways. Or forethought. Jump from cellular cultures, right into human trials of that new gene editing technique. What's the worst that could happen?

Ask China, lol.

No, really.

 

[Hodor]

Yeah, because who needs ethics anyways. Or forethought. Jump from cellular cultures, right into human trials of that new gene editing technique. What's the worst that could happen?

Oh, no, they didn't ban it because of ethics. They've banned it because they wanna reserve the best inventions for themselves. Peasants shouldn't enjoy the same level of comfort as bankers, fund managers, owners of the law firms, or pharmaceuticals. Nope. Peasants at maximum can get organs from people who died in wars (who said "Ukraine"?) or from pigs. Yes, they are now trying to grow organs in pigs, because that's what they think of us.

And that's what I think of them too.

However, technology where you grow organs from the patient's own tissue, his own DNA, in a bottle, and then implant it....... nope. It exists, but it's not for peasants. Technology where you regenerate organs and tissues directly inside the body, without implanting at all..... nope. That's reserved for the top pigs. Not for peasants.

That's the main reason they've banned it. How to recognize such technology? Easily. It's when several successful experiments happen, and everyone wants the product, but they say: "Well, the tests were successful, but we don't expect this to hit the market in the next 30-50 years".

So, basically they say: "We have this wonderful new product that everyone wants, but we don't want to earn money selling it." When the rich pigs don't wanna money, then you know it's hidden technology. Because normally they'd sell their mother for money. Twice.