Silicon Valley Bank collapses in biggest American bank failure since 2008 financial crisis

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,382   +43
Staff
Ouch! The bank that financed many Silicon Valley startups just ran out of money in the second-biggest bank collapse in US history. The failure will seriously damage the venture capital economy and is already hurting the banking sector at least in the short term. However, the risk of a 2008-style collapse is low.

Update (Mar 13): The US Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC made a joint statement on Monday announcing that all Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) depositors will be "fully" protected and their money will be available on March 13. The statement reads that after taking action by the aforementioned regulation bodies, the FDIC will complete "its resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, in a manner that fully protects all depositors. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer."

This is the largest rescue package from the US government since the 2008 financial crisis. The White House insists this is not a bailout, and according to Axios, "this is nothing radical or new," as uninsured depositors have been paid out in full in every bank failure except for IndyMac in 2008.

Silicon Valley Bank failed on Friday after a massive run on deposits, putting almost $175 billion, including money from some of the biggest tech companies, under the control of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). The bank had been a significant venture capital funding source for technology companies, the New York Times reports.

The institution is exploring a potential sale as it halts all share trading. The FDIC will hold the Silicon Valley Bank's deposits and assets at the recently built National Bank of Santa Clara, which should be operational by Monday. Silicon Valley Bank-issued checks will still clear.

However, the bank's insurance policy only covers deposits under $250,000. Accounts over that amount will eventually receive certificates to be partially paid back for their uninsured money. Less than three percent of Silicon Valley Bank's deposits were insured since it dealt with many Big Tech firms.

Silicon Valley Bank had used its bountiful capital from venture funds to invest in bonds, which produced reliable returns due to low-interest rates. Between 2018 and 2021, the bank's deposits grew from $49 billion to $189.2 billion. However, last year's federal interest rate hikes upended the strategy.

The bank responded with some cautionary measures this week, but the announcements of those moves started a panic. Silicon Valley Bank sold some securities at a loss, selling $21 billion in investments, borrowing $15 billion, and raising cash through an emergency stock sale. The poor reception to these decisions triggered a bank run as its stock price plummeted.

The fallout caused Signature Bank and Western Alliance to end Friday more than 20 percent down. PacWest Bancorp dropped by over 35 percent. Other large banks, however, like JPMorgan and Wells Fargo, are fine, ending slightly up on Friday. Bank of America and Morgan Stanley suffered minor declines.

The fall of Silicon Valley Bank is the biggest US bank failure since the collapse of Washington Mutual in 2008 – the largest in American history – which affected $300 billion in customer deposits.

Permalink to story.

 
SVB was a major financial conduit between the tech sector, it's founders and startups as well as it's workers so when the sector started feeling pressure the entire industry was hit, which hit SVB. Tech sector stocks being hit hard for the past 18 months was the perfect predictor of things to come. So when tech workers and investors started their run on the bank, it was doomed. SVB's sale of bonds created a further shortfall, all of which will have a major impact on start-ups but very little effect on other banks and holding companies .....
 
Stunning to read about companies that all had of their cash in one bank. Roku had $500 of its $1.5B in SVB. Other startups had millions, representing all of their cash. Why not diversify your choice of banks, particularly when the bank you're in is in a risky business.

This is basic financial management 101 - city councils etc have been caught out etc wth rate payers money
 
That`s what happens to banks who love crypto. Your assets are zero.

This collapse has nothing to do crypto.

This bank finances the tech sector. What has happened is due to the rise in interest rates, tech compnaies are struggling to raise capital, so they have raided their saving the SVB. This caused a run on the bank and the bank itself has struggled to raise capital. If all your customers pull their money out you are stuffed.

This problem probably won't spread to the largest banks, not that SVB was small, but there are many smaller financial institutions serving a similar role and plenty of these will also collapse as idi0ts in central banks around the world continue to raise interest rates.
 
Last edited:
BreitbartNews ... that completes the picture.
You are posting on a tech forum so I expect you to know what a hyperlink is. There are multiple hyperlinks to sources such as the London Times and a tweet from the official UK govt. site in that article. Being able to read English is always a plus on a site such as this one.
 
That`s what happens to banks who love crypto. Your assets are zero.
The bank failed because of the interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve hurting its investments in *bonds*. Absolutely, nothing to do with crypto.

The tech companies lost their money in a traditional bank. Literally the opposite of crypto investment.

Sorry reality doesn’t line up with your assumption when you saw silicon valley and bank failure.
 
The bank failed because of the interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve hurting its investments in *bonds*. Absolutely, nothing to do with crypto.

The tech companies lost their money in a traditional bank. Literally the opposite of crypto investment.

Sorry reality doesn’t line up with your assumption when you saw silicon valley and bank failure.
Another feel good story in relation to SVB ^^

 
If you go back in time to when money didn't exist... you would realise it is a man made system of super fail.
It is all just as mad as crypto, except that in their stock markets they believe gold is sexy, when in fact it looks super trashy, but as long as the rich people think its worth something, it is. I mean, its not a rare metal anymore, you can pull plenty from a gypos jaw. =)

IF you are a bank, you want .... wait here comes the Kanye West bit, you want all the celebs and all the people that created them in the first place to bank with you.

- the Kanye bit being that all these guys are Jewish, and tight with their monies, hoarding awaiting WW3.

But too many rich people hoarding means money isnt in the system, the governments spend what money they have on weapons and war deterents, I assume because the crumbling system makes them look a target?
Instead of putting the money into healthcare, roads and infrastructure, fixing those cracks, because they dont have enough, cause, greedy rich *****s who dont wanna pay tax and pay lawyers to offshore.

Interest rates go up, inflation to counter act, try to level out, and then it all tips and sinks like the titanic, again.

This s*** has happened time and time again, because, morons, don't learn from their history lessons.

The first country to ditch money will actually strive. Do-able, if youre half democratic half communist.
 
Generations living in debt do not want to pay their debts. Generations that agreed that thieves' criminal banks could lend $10 to a depositor's $1. What's new in this? Why does the population choose criminal populists who work for the banking mafia that creates money out of thin air, and not sensible politicians? Why will the population not be forced to adopt laws, by instantaneous recall of lying politicians?

The world goes around in a stupid circle among hordes of rams-consumers, and not productive creators who are able to control their expenses and not build up debt beyond what is necessary for a normal life. Do not buy any nonsense, do not borrow. Then there will be no inflation.

If you and your parents do not have money for education, ask the question - why is everything so arranged in the system that parents work, pay taxes, but they do not have money for the education of their children. And is this "education" worth the money. And is it worth it to have children at all if there is no normal life and environment for their high-quality rearing?

If a venture investor lends money, he must understand the risks. If the money was obtained by labor, and not stolen by ingenious means in a corrupt system that was rotten to the core.

But you can’t forgive debts if you signed it yourself. Pay and do not try to get out at the level of whole generations, with the seal of candy wrappers, in order to burn the purchasing power of the borrowed in the fire of inflation.

Now the usual generational conflict has begun - new generations of slaves do not want to work hard to pay the debts accumulated by the old generations. They were corrupted by the environment and their parents are to blame.

This has taken on a global scale precisely because of what I have been writing about for more than 15 years - the number of productive population within a civilization has decreased several times over 100 years.
Most of the world's population has become city dwellers - but how many of them create a valuable product? 10-15-20%? But definitely not 50%+. The remaining layers, unproductive for the new civilization, are no longer needed. Their place in the dustbin of history...

Stocks are rubbish, bonds are rubbish if you can't force the debtor to repay over a long period of time the SAME purchasing power of the money you lent him. If the debtor has a printing press in the currency in which you gave him, you are lost if you cannot stop the debtor from printing money by force. Only a forceful impact on debtors stops the madness of credit pumping. It is not the bank that gives you money - you take it, turning a blind eye to the problems of the system, because borrowing seems to you a collective easy way out on a personal level. But you are mistaken if you are not standing close in line to the printing press. As always, the stupid crowd is mistaken ...
 
This is actually the reason we need crypto, you cannot trust the banks.
The banks were stockpiling gold and precious metals, now they manipulated the market and might cause an artificial crash they will sell that gold at the highest price and buy companies on the cheap. They are the ones marketing 1 Bitcoin forecasted to the sky. There are rumors the fed wants to push their own version of usd blockchain digital currency. What other way can they introduce this other than a bailout. If banks borrow from each other to in which they do, this might cause a chain reaction.
 
Back