About the only possible thing I can come up with to add is, "black lives matter".Toxic masculinity fixes 90% of problems in men with low testosterone. Try cutting back on the soy.
So the Cretaceous period was a warm front? Learn to read.
Fluctuating global temperatures over time is climate change. Man irreparably altering that cycle and turning the world into an unlivable planet is the fearmongering.
Lesson time, ladies and gentlemen. This ^^^ is what projection looks like.
Just moments before typing this, Scorpion accused me of not knowing the difference between weather and climate. He then immediately cites weather as evidence of climate change, further emphasizing that geopolitics and war is, in fact, intrinsically a part of climate change.
You'll note that this has been a favorite go-to for MMCCBs since around 2013, when "climate as war" first became popular.
None of these thoughts are actually his own. Rather, some official-looking dudes told him some very scary things about the future (not unlike the Vatican back in the day) and he simply evangelizes, being careful to remind us that unbelievers will suffer God's wrath:
There are people who have meaningful discussions about this topic. And by that I mean people who believe in man made climate change who have productive conversations. This guy surrounds himself with people who agree with him on most issues, and therefore only cites talking points as a result of never having to actually deconstruct the subject matter beyond "I know, right?"
Engage for entertainment purposes only.
So far I've collected the first 5 seasons on DVD or Blu-Ray. I only watched the first few episodes of season 1. I plan on buying all seasons until the finale, and then binge watching the entire show until its conclusion. I figure that's the only way to stave off the, "OMG I have to know what's going to happen next or I'll explode", sentiments this program seems to invoke.I think its funny when people compare **** to Game of Thrones. I never watched it so I have no idea what the hell people are talking about.
The oceans are the largest oxygen producers, not CO2, please double-check your statements. As for "sacrificing the economy of a country", creating or maintaining the jobs of coal miners (you know, coal, something that the Romans were exploiting one hundred years AD...? ah, but yes, that was in Europe, mostly, Donald was born in the land of the free, he wouldn't know that...) is hardly the economy of a country being saved. You want new jobs? Invest and promote in alternate, ecological energy sources, like wind turbines, wave energy converters, solar panels. Those have a cleaner future than coal mining, and they would provide more jobs than coal mining, if that would have been the real issue. Sadly, it's not. But Donald Duck IS thinking long-term, indeed: his supporters are just as dumb as he is and he needs to keep them that way, by feeding them alternate facts. I'm pretty sure that the USA that Trump (oh, this name so suits him!) dreams about has nothing to do with progress, science or civilization, but everything with selfishness and imposing his own retrograde vision onto a whole nation. Because he can, at least for the next 188 weeks or so.Is climate change real? Yes as it has always been but the part where people attribute this change largely on man-made pollution is the false part. I bet these are the same people saying it was "global warming" before. The major factor in climate has always been the sun and the major source of CO2 has always been the sea. Nonetheless, keeping the world clean is not such a bad idea and the best case could be to strike a balance where the economy of a country is not entirely sacrificed just to fan the flames of a baseless hysteria.
You want new jobs? Invest and promote in alternate, ecological energy sources, like wind turbines, wave energy converters, solar panels. Those have a cleaner future than coal mining, and they would provide more jobs than coal mining [...]
You want new jobs? Invest and promote in alternate, ecological energy sources, like wind turbines, wave energy converters, solar panels. Those have a cleaner future than coal mining, and they would provide more jobs than coal mining [...]
Do try using your own words next time. Oh, and thinking, too.
Do try using your own words next time. Oh, and thinking, too.
^^^ This genius thinks calling someone stupid in twelve words is smarter than doing it with one.
Couldn't refute the implication so he went straight to name calling.
No, I really could not see the relation between the video you linked to and my quote. That's why I asked you to use your own words and thinking. But if you feel I attacked you in any way, you may well be a Trump supporter. Please calm down and take a long, deep and smoke-filled breath.
Your projection is showing.
The oceans are the largest oxygen producers, not CO2, please double-check your statements. As for "sacrificing the economy of a country", creating or maintaining the jobs of coal miners (you know, coal, something that the Romans were exploiting one hundred years AD...? ah, but yes, that was in Europe, mostly, Donald was born in the land of the free, he wouldn't know that...) is hardly the economy of a country being saved. You want new jobs? Invest and promote in alternate, ecological energy sources, like wind turbines, wave energy converters, solar panels. Those have a cleaner future than coal mining, and they would provide more jobs than coal mining, if that would have been the real issue. Sadly, it's not. But Donald Duck IS thinking long-term, indeed: his supporters are just as dumb as he is and he needs to keep them that way, by feeding them alternate facts. I'm pretty sure that the USA that Trump (oh, this name so suits him!) dreams about has nothing to do with progress, science or civilization, but everything with selfishness and imposing his own retrograde vision onto a whole nation. Because he can, at least for the next 188 weeks or so.Is climate change real? Yes as it has always been but the part where people attribute this change largely on man-made pollution is the false part. I bet these are the same people saying it was "global warming" before. The major factor in climate has always been the sun and the major source of CO2 has always been the sea. Nonetheless, keeping the world clean is not such a bad idea and the best case could be to strike a balance where the economy of a country is not entirely sacrificed just to fan the flames of a baseless hysteria.
President Trump did the right thing, and his promise to pull out of that awful deal is one of the reasons many of us, including myself, voted for him.
Sure, a lot of tech leaders are upset, partly because they are predominately Democrats, but also because they see that bad deal as being very good for their bottom lines. Mr. Musk in particular would see greater demand for his electric cars and solar roofs and batteries if we had stayed in that bad deal.
And yet the likes of DiCaprio and Musk condemn him yet they fly around to all these environmental meetings in their private jets. Hmmm....
"full retard" is so accurate.
1. The Paris accord has a voluntary self chosen commitment. The 3Bil $ was a choice the US made, not imposed by anyone else. So no threat to sovereignty -Pres Trump flat out LIES/is clueless AF.
2. Bad deal? The USA CHOSE the deal themselves , they chose their own commitment level.
3. Unfair to USA alone? the rest of the world gets a free ride? None of the other countries pulled out, they are all going through the same struggles. China ponied up MORE MONEY than USA , are they benefiting/getting a free ride?
4.Renegotiate the deal? With who? gonna get mother nature at the table and go and grab her by the P***Y Trump?
FML USA your president needs to go back to school.