With GeForce RTX 30 series and Radeon RX 6000 GPUs now out, it's time to revisit the best gaming monitors that complement the performance from next-gen cards, divided in four key categories: 1440p, 4K, ultrawides and 1080p.
With GeForce RTX 30 series and Radeon RX 6000 GPUs now out, it's time to revisit the best gaming monitors that complement the performance from next-gen cards, divided in four key categories: 1440p, 4K, ultrawides and 1080p.
I don't see mention of G-Sync in this article. Given the 3080 target, which level of G-Sync do each of these monitors support (Ultimate/G-Sync/Compatible?) Or is there no mention because of a belief there is no longer any material difference between them and/or FreeSync?
yeah, 500USD is not really a value deal in my book. I might not be as wealthy as most of us here on TechSpot, but I would have thought it would be around the 250-300 level instead of 500.When your "value" 1440p display still costs $500. We could cut that price in half if the gamer is willing to drop from IPS to VA.
When your "value" 1440p display still costs $500. We could cut that price in half if the gamer is willing to drop from IPS to VA.
From the intro:yeah, 500USD is not really a value deal in my book. I might not be as wealthy as most of us here on TechSpot, but I would have thought it would be around the 250-300 level instead of 500.
Thanks Julio, I missed that to be honest.From the intro:
As a side note, you will find some of these top picks to offer good value, but if you're playing games and want great value and decent performance, you can also check out our Best Budget Gaming Monitors guide.
I don't see mention of G-Sync in this article.
That's just a rebrand of existing LG 38GN950I want the new Alienware 38".
Fairly certain it's this:I want to know what monitor the guy in the header is using, because it sure as heck isn't any of the 16:9 (or 21:9) monitors listed in this review.
I don't see mention of G-Sync in this article. Given the 3080 target, which level of G-Sync do each of these monitors support (Ultimate/G-Sync/Compatible?) Or is there no mention because of a belief there is no longer any material difference between them and/or FreeSync?
Monitor makers care about whatever will sell monitors of course. In past years that certainly included some models that included G-sync hardware modules, which offered some actual VRR benefit and/or some marketing benefit.
What I'm looking to better understand now, and which this article failed to address, is 1) is anyone (including Nvidia) asserting that the G-sync hardware module still adds benefit over base open standard VRR with Ampere and current/upcoming monitors; 2) has any testing confirmed that to be the case; and 3) if so, which monitors include it.
If it is true that the VESA standard has completely caught up and Nvidia and monitor manufacturers have all given up on the G-sync proprietary stuff, that could be great news, I just missed the memo where that was laid out (seems like it would be worth an article or at least a sentence in this one!)
When your "value" 1440p display still costs $500. We could cut that price in half if the gamer is willing to drop from IPS to VA.