The return of supersonic travel inches closer following Boom's successful XB-1 test flight

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
What just happened? It's been 20 years since the last supersonic commercial aircraft, Concorde, was retired. But if startup Boom Supersonic's plan works out, a new jet flying faster than the speed of sound will take to the skies in the next six years. That dream has taken another step toward reality after a successful test flight of its prototype aircraft.

Boom Supersonic on Friday announced that its XB-1 prototype jet had completed a successful mission over the Mojave Desert.

The subsonic test flight began at 7:28 am on Thursday. The 62-foot jet reached a maximum altitude of 7,120 feet and a top speed of 246 knots (283 mph) before landing 12 minutes later.

Boom Supersonic writes that XB-1, which uses three 1950s-era J85 turbojet engines, is a demonstrator aircraft featuring several state-of-the-art technologies that will be used in Overture, the commercial supersonic aircraft that the company is working on. This includes carbon fiber composites, advanced avionics, digitally-optimized aerodynamics, and an advanced supersonic propulsion system.

"Today, XB-1 took flight in the same hallowed airspace where the Bell X-1 first broke the sound barrier in 1947," said Blake Scholl, founder and CEO of Boom Supersonic. "I've been looking forward to this flight since founding Boom in 2014, and it marks the most significant milestone yet on our path to bring supersonic travel to passengers worldwide."

Back in 2022, American Airlines announced that it placed an order for up to 20 Overture aircraft, with an option for an additional 40. United Airlines is also buying 15 Overture jets, and Boom Supersonic has manufacturing partnerships with Florida Turbine Technologies and GE Additive. However, The Verge points out that Boom Supersonic was dealt a blow in 2022 when British manufacturing giant Rolls Royce pulled out of its partnership with the company, leaving Boom to develop its own engines.

Boom Supersonic wants Overture's first test flight to take place before 2030. Three times larger than XB-1, the jet will carry 64 to 80 passengers at Mach 1.7, about twice the speed of today's subsonic airliners. It's also designed to run on 100% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), and will be powered by four of Boom's own engines, called Symphony, each delivering around three times the combined output of the XB-1's three J85 engines.

There are some major obstacles Boom needs to address before Overture becomes a reality. The first is money: Scholl says the company has raised $700 million, but completing the supersonic jet could cost $8 billion. There's also the fact that regulations against sonic booms mean that Overture might have its full speed limited to times when it travels over water, though technologies could turn the booms into "thumps."

There's also the sustainability question; 64 passengers isn't a lot compared to what today's large aircraft can carry, and flying at those speeds will eat up a lot of fuel. However, SAF could help mitigate the environmental impact.

"We're still targeting being in the air around the end of the decade on Overture. There's a lot of work to do between now and then on that airplane, and our goal is to do it safely but also with a sense of urgency because we want this airplane for ourselves, our friends, our family, and our customers," said Scholl.

Permalink to story.

 
Should of had Yeager flying it and it would have broke the sound barrier. The man could have done it with a rubber band wind up balsa plane. 283 mph ain't anything to brag about. Unless your name is Wiley Post
 
Hallowed air space? The marketing blather is thick with this one.

Should of had Yeager flying it and it would have broke the sound barrier. The man could have done it with a rubber band wind up balsa plane. 283 mph ain't anything to brag about. Unless your name is Wiley Post
:rolleyes: Rather hard for Yeager to do as he died in 2020 - rest his soul. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Yeager My apologies for bursting your bubble.

EDIT: From the article, it does not look like they intended to go supersonic. It sounds like this was a test just to see if the airplane would fly. A crucial step, IMO, to a supersonic test.
 
Last edited:
Traveled a few times on the Concorde and would really like the opportunity to fly supersonic just one more time before I cash it all in ..... I'm sure Yeager would have loved to fly on it before he was gone .....
 
8 billion dollar budget makes me think about how much was spent on the Falcon rockets in comparison. Odd to think developing a supersonic passenger plane is projected to cost multiple times the development cost of a reusable launch system.

Aerospace just isn't simple.
 
Hallowed air space? The marketing blather is thick with this one.


:rolleyes: Rather hard for Yeager to do as he died in 2020 - rest his soul. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Yeager My apologies for bursting your bubble.

EDIT: From the article, it does not look like they intended to go supersonic. It sounds like this was a test just to see if the airplane would fly. A crucial step, IMO, to a supersonic test.
Yes he died. Now I know you have no imagination before I only suspected.
 
"The return of supersonic travel inches closer following Boom's successful XB-1 test flight"

Laughable...! Flying a fighter size jet to gimmick a full passenger jetliner...!
 
"The return of supersonic travel inches closer following Boom's successful XB-1 test flight"

Laughable...! Flying a fighter size jet to gimmick a full passenger jetliner...!

Agreed. While understanding if a supersonic airframe is stable at subsonic speeds is important, the difference to a 50-seat airliner is huge. They've also been dialing down the specs on the Boom Overture for a while now... Honestly, I respect their commitment, but I don't see how this will be any different from modernizing a Concorde with composite materials, modern engines, and so forth. Was there anything fundamentally wrong with the original Concorde? Yes. The cost of jet fuel. Today it won't be any cheaper, so why not just move on with a Concorde II?
 
I don't see how this will be any different from modernizing a Concorde with composite materials, modern engines, and so forth. Was there anything fundamentally wrong with the original Concorde? Yes. The cost of jet fuel.
The Concorde achieved supersonic flight by using afterburners, which consume fuel like it's going out of style. Between the more efficient engines, the lighter composite airframe, and the lower drag ratio, Boom Overture should be far more economical to operate.
 
.05% rich guy detected
“to fly one way onboard Concorde between London and Washington. Adjusted for inflation, that's about $2,800 in today's money.”

A quick Google shows the Concorde was about 2X first-class tickets. Not cheap, but not crazy money if you have a good job.

The real rich buy planes not tickets.
 
Back